Literature DB >> 17970261

Shaping academic task engagement with percentile schedules.

Elizabeth S Athens1, Timothy R Vollmer, Claire C St Peter Pipkin.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the use of percentile schedules as a method of quantifying the shaping procedure in an educational setting. We compared duration of task engagement during baseline measurements for 4 students to duration of task engagement during a percentile schedule. As a secondary purpose, we examined the influence on shaping of manipulations of the number of observations used to determine the criterion for reinforcement (the m parameter of the percentile formula). Results showed that the percentile formula was most effective when a relatively large m value (20 observations) was used.

Mesh：

Year:  2007        PMID： 17970261      PMCID： PMC1986693          DOI： 10.1901/jaba.2007.40-475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN： 0021-8855


  17 in total

1.  Shaping in the 21st century: Moving percentile schedules into applied settings.

Authors:  G Galbicka
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

2.  Reinforcement rate and interresponse time differentiation.

Authors:  D O Kuch; J R Platt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Modification of severe disruptive and aggressive behavior using brief timeout and reinforcement procedures.

Authors:  D E Bostow; J B Bailey
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1969

4.  Control over response number by a targeted percentile schedule: reinforcement loss and the acute effects of d-amphetamine.

Authors:  G Galbicka; K P Fowler; Z J Ritch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

6.  Operant conditioning of behavioral variability using a percentile reinforcement schedule.

Authors:  A Machado
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Response acquisition under targeted percentile schedules: a continuing quandary for molar models of operant behavior.

Authors:  G Galbicka; M A Kautz; T Jagers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Reinforcing variability in adolescents with autism.

Authors:  N Miller; A Neuringer
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

9.  Reinforcement magnitude and responding during treatment with differential reinforcement.

Authors:  Dorothea C Lerman; Michael E Kelley; Christina M Vorndran; Stephanie A C Kuhn; Robert H LaRue
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

10.  Improving contingency management programs for addiction.

Authors:  R J Lamb; K C Kirby; A R Morral; G Galbicka; M Y Iguchi
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.913
View more
  5 in total

1.  The aesthetics of intervention in defense of the esoteric.

Authors:  Iser G Deleon
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2011

2.  A tribute to sidney w. Bijou, pioneer in behavior analysis and child development: key works that have transformed behavior analysis in practice.

Authors:  Amber E Mendres; Michelle A Frank-Crawford
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2009

3.  Gamification of dietary decision-making in an elementary-school cafeteria.

Authors:  Brooke A Jones; Gregory J Madden; Heidi J Wengreen; Sheryl S Aguilar; E Anne Desjardins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Shaping smoking cessation in hard-to-treat smokers.

Authors:  R J Lamb; Kimberly C Kirby; Andrew R Morral; Greg Galbicka; Martin Y Iguchi
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2010-02

5.  Using percentile schedules to increase eye contact in children with Fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Scott S Hall; Natalee P Maynes; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2009
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.