Literature DB >> 21541123

Reinforcing saccadic amplitude variability.

Céline Paeye1, Laurent Madelain.   

Abstract

Saccadic endpoint variability is often viewed as the outcome of neural noise occurring during sensorimotor processing. However, part of this variability might result from operant learning. We tested this hypothesis by reinforcing dispersions of saccadic amplitude distributions, while maintaining constant their medians. In a first experiment we reinforced the least frequent saccadic amplitudes to increase variability, and then reinforced the central part of the amplitude distributions to reduce variability. The target was placed at a constant distance from the fovea after the saccade to maintain the postsaccadic visual signal constant and an auditory reinforcement was delivered depending on saccadic amplitude. The second experiment tested the effects of the contingency. We reinforced high levels of variability in 4 participants, whereas 4 other participants were assigned to a yoked control group. On average, saccadic amplitude standard deviations were doubled while the medians remained mostly unchanged in the experimental participants in both experiments, and variability returned to baseline level when low variability was reinforced. In the control group no consistent changes in amplitude distributions were observed. These results, showing that variability can be reinforced, challenge the idea of a stochastic neural noise. We instead propose that selection processes constrain saccadic amplitude distributions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  humans; motor control; ocular saccade; operant; selection; shaping; variability

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21541123      PMCID: PMC3047256          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2011.95-149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  59 in total

1.  The influence of urgency on decision time.

Authors:  B A Reddi; R H Carpenter
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  An optimal period for setting sustained variability levels.

Authors:  P D Stokes; P Balsam
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

3.  Behavioral variability and frequency-dependent selection.

Authors:  A Machado
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The urgency to look: prompt saccades to the benefit of perception.

Authors:  Anna Montagnini; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Square-root relations between main saccadic parameters.

Authors:  S Lebedev; P Van Gelder; W H Tsui
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Response acquisition under targeted percentile schedules: a continuing quandary for molar models of operant behavior.

Authors:  G Galbicka; M A Kautz; T Jagers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Selection by consequences.

Authors:  B F Skinner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-07-31       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The reinforcement of least-frequent interresponse times.

Authors:  D S Blough
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Saccadic system plasticity in humans.

Authors:  L A Abel; D Schmidt; L F Dell'Osso; R B Daroff
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Saccadic eye movements minimize the consequences of motor noise.

Authors:  Robert J van Beers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Modification of saccadic gain by reinforcement.

Authors:  Laurent Madelain; Céline Paeye; Josh Wallman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Saccade adaptation goes for the goal.

Authors:  Laurent Madelain; James P Herman; Mark R Harwood
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  Saccade adaptation as a model of flexible and general motor learning.

Authors:  James P Herman; Annabelle Blangero; Laurent Madelain; Afsheen Khan; Mark R Harwood
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  Probability of seeing increases saccadic readiness.

Authors:  Thérèse Collins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A novel task for the investigation of action acquisition.

Authors:  Tom Stafford; Martin Thirkettle; Tom Walton; Nicolas Vautrelle; Len Hetherington; Michael Port; Kevin Gurney; Pete Redgrave
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Dignity neuroscience: universal rights are rooted in human brain science.

Authors:  Tara L White; Meghan A Gonsalves
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 6.499

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.