Literature DB >> 2921584

Response-reinforcer contingency and spatially defined operants: testing an invariance property of phi.

G Galbicka1, J R Platt.   

Abstract

A chamber containing 72 response keys defining the circumference of a circle 1 m in diameter was used to examine the relation between differentiation of response location and a measure of response-reinforcer contingency known as the phi coefficient. A different target key was specified in each successive phase, and response location was differentiated with respect to the target. Criterional and noncriterional responses (i.e., responses "near" and "far" from the target) were defined using targeted percentile schedules to control the overall probability of each response class. By manipulating criterional (and, hence, noncriterional) response probability and the reinforcement probabilities conditional on each, a mathematical invariance property peculiar to phi in contingency analysis was examined. Specifically, diagonally interchanging cell frequencies in a 2 x 2 table relating criterional/noncriterional responses to reinforcement/nonreinforcement leaves phi unchanged. Hence, the degree of response differentiation predicted by phi remains unchanged under the four permutations implied by the various diagonal interchanges. This predicted invariance was examined under values of phi equal to .33, .58, and .82. Increasing phi generally increased the stereotypy of response location. Three of the permutations generated almost interchangeable performance at different phi values. The remaining permutation, however, generated functions relating response concentration to phi with slopes shallower than those obtained under the other permutations. This resulted from relatively higher levels of differentiation, compared to the other permutations, at low phi values. These data strongly suggest boundary conditions on the ability of phi to reflect completely the local processes that are indexed by phi at a molar level.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2921584      PMCID: PMC1338897          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Sequential dependencies in free-responding.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Differentiating the behavior of organisms.

Authors:  G Galbicka
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory.

Authors:  M C Davison; R D Tustin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Variability of response location for pigeons responding under continuous reinforcement, intermittent reinforcement, and extinction.

Authors:  D A Eckerman; R N Lanson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Reinforcement rate and interresponse time differentiation.

Authors:  D O Kuch; J R Platt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Parametric manipulation of interresponse-time contingency independent of reinforcement rate.

Authors:  G Galbicka; J R Platt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1986-10

9.  A computer analysis of serial interactions in spaced responding.

Authors:  B Weiss; V G Laties; L Siegel; D Goldstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Reinforcement contingencies and signal detection.

Authors:  J A Nevin; P Jenkins; S Whittaker; P Yarensky
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  13 in total

1.  Identifying possible contingencies during descriptive analyses of severe behavior disorders.

Authors:  T R Vollmer; J C Borrero; C S Wright; C Van Camp; J S Lalli
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

2.  Reinforcement contingencies and social reinforcement: some reciprocal relations between basic and applied research.

Authors:  T R Vollmer; T D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

3.  Modeling games from the 20th century.

Authors:  P R. Killeen
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2001-05-03       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Shaping in the 21st century: Moving percentile schedules into applied settings.

Authors:  G Galbicka
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

5.  The dynamics of behavior (Editorial).

Authors:  G Galbicka
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Response induction during the acquisition and maintenance of lever pressing with delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  Rogelio Escobar; Carlos A Bruner
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Control over response number by a targeted percentile schedule: reinforcement loss and the acute effects of d-amphetamine.

Authors:  G Galbicka; K P Fowler; Z J Ritch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Effects of reinforcing preselected approximations on the topography of the rat's bar press.

Authors:  P D Stokes; P D Balsam
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The effects of variable-time delivery of food items and praise on problem behavior reinforced by escape.

Authors:  Joanna E Lomas; Wayne W Fisher; Michael E Kelley
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2010

10.  The response-stimulus contingency and reinforcement learning as a context for considering two non-behavior-analytic views of contingency learning.

Authors:  J L Gewirtz
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1997
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.