Literature DB >> 12613672

Operant variability: evidence, functions, and theory.

Allen Neuringer1.   

Abstract

Although responses are sometimes easy to predict, at other times responding seems highly variable, unpredictable, or even random. The inability to predict is generally attributed to ignorance of controlling variables, but this article is a review of research showing that the highest levels of behavioral variability may result from identifiable reinforcers contingent on such variability. That is, variability is an operant. Discriminative stimuli and reinforcers control it, resulting in low or high variability, depending on the contingencies. Schedule-of-reinforcement effects are orderly, and choosing to vary or repeat is lawfully governed by relative reinforcement frequencies. The operant nature of variability has important implications. For example, learning, exploring, creating, and problem solving may partly depend on it. Abnormal levels of variability, including those found in psychopathologies such as autism, depression, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, may be modified through reinforcement. Operant variability may also help to explain some of the unique attributes of voluntary action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12613672     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  79 in total

1.  An optimal period for setting sustained variability levels.

Authors:  P D Stokes; P Balsam
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

2.  Comparing choices and variations in people and rats: two teaching experiments.

Authors:  A Neuringer; C Deiss; S Imig
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2000-08

3.  Effects on deprivation and reinforcement-magnitude of response variability.

Authors:  P L CARLTON
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Development of complex, stereotyped behavior in pigeons.

Authors:  B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Response variability in the white rat during conditioning, extinction, and reconditioning.

Authors:  J J ANTONITIS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1951-10

6.  Age-related differences in random generation.

Authors:  M Van der Linden; A Beerten; M Pesenti
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 7.  Detrimental effects of reward. Reality or myth?

Authors:  R Eisenberger; J Cameron
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1996-11

8.  The role of attention in the treatment of attention-maintained self-injurious behavior: noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior.

Authors:  T R Vollmer; B A Iwata; J R Zarcone; R G Smith; J L Mazaleski
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1993

9.  The phylogeny and ontogeny of behavior. Contingencies of reinforcement throw light on contingencies of survival in the evolution of behavior.

Authors:  B F Skinner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-09-09       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  The reinforcement of least-frequent interresponse times.

Authors:  D S Blough
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  53 in total

1.  B. F. Skinner's Science and Human Behavior: its antecedents and its consequences.

Authors:  A Charles Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The aesthetics of behavioral arrangements.

Authors:  Philip N Hineline
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2005

3.  Behaviorism, latent learning, and cognitive maps: needed revisions in introductory psychology textbooks.

Authors:  Robert Jensen
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2006

4.  Religion as schedule-induced behavior.

Authors:  Paul S Strand
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2009

5.  A runs-test algorithm: contingent reinforcement and response run structures.

Authors:  Yosuke Hachiga; Takayuki Sakagami
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  History effects on induced and operant variability.

Authors:  Alessandra da Silva Souza; Josele Abreu-Rodrigues; Ana Amélia Baumann
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Dynamic response-by-response models of matching behavior in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Brian Lau; Paul W Glimcher
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Operant variability when reinforcement is delayed.

Authors:  Katie Wagner; Allen Neuringer
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  The effects of delayed reinforcement on variability and repetition of response sequences.

Authors:  Amy L Odum; Ryan D Ward; Christopher A Barnes; K Anne Burke
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 10.  How Outcome Uncertainty Mediates Attention, Learning, and Decision-Making.

Authors:  Ilya E Monosov
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 13.837

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.