Literature DB >> 19591911

The "lunching" effect: pigeons track motion towards food more than motion away from it.

Felipe Cabrera1, Federico Sanabria, David Shelley, Peter R Killeen.   

Abstract

Four experiments measured pigeons' pecking at a small touch-screen image (the CS) that moved towards or away from a source of food (the US). The image's effectiveness as a CS was dependent on its motion, direction, and distance relative to the US. Pecking to the CS increased with proximity to the US when the CS moved towards the US (Experiment 1). This held true even when a departing CS signalled a US of greater magnitude (Experiment 2). Response rates to stationary stimuli were greater the closer they were to the hopper; but rate was less than when the same spot was part of a motion towards food, and greater than when it was part of a motion away (Experiment 3). The rate of responding in all three cases (motion towards, stationary, motion away) decreased exponentially with distance from the hopper. The distance and motion effects observed under these Pavlovian contingencies were different when pecking to the spot was required for reinforcement (Experiment 4).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19591911      PMCID: PMC2775455          DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  27 in total

1.  The 28th Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Causal learning: an associative analysis.

Authors:  A Dickinson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2001-02

2.  Perceptual causality and animacy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 3.  A review of recent developments in research and theories on human contingency learning.

Authors:  Jan De Houwer; Tom Beckers
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2002-10

4.  Blocking, unblocking, and overexpectation in autoshaping with pigeons.

Authors:  Y Khallad; J Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Pigeons' discrimination of Michotte's launching effect.

Authors:  Michael E Young; Joshua S Beckmann; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Conditional probability versus spatial contiguity in causal learning: Preschoolers use new contingency evidence to overcome prior spatial assumptions.

Authors:  Tamar Kushnir; Alison Gopnik
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2007-01

7.  Time cues block the CS, but the CS does not block time cues.

Authors:  D A Williams; V M LoLordo
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1995-05

8.  Auditory food cue conditioning: effects of spatial contiguity and taste quality.

Authors:  S R Ellins; S von Kluge
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1990-02

9.  Bridging temporal gaps between CS and US in autoshaping: insertion of other stimuli before, during, and after CS.

Authors:  P S Kaplan; E Hearst
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1982-04

10.  Sign- versus goal-tracking: effects of conditioned-stimulus-to-unconditioned-stimulus distance.

Authors:  F J Silva; K M Silva; J J Pear
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  An Information Theoretic Approach to Model Selection: A Tutorial with Monte Carlo Confirmation.

Authors:  M Christopher Newland
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2019-06-19

2.  The form of a conditioned stimulus can influence the degree to which it acquires incentive motivational properties.

Authors:  Paul J Meyer; Elizabeth S Cogan; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.