Literature DB >> 12169424

Learning an object from multiple views enhances its recognition in an orthogonal rotational axis in pigeons.

Jessie J Peissig1, Edward A Wasserman, Michael E Young, Irving Biederman.   

Abstract

In the natural environment, most objects are seen from several different viewpoints. We explored the nature of recognition after training with multiple views and compared it to recognition after training with only one view. Pigeons were taught with either five views or one view of each of four single-geon objects. Pigeons trained with five views responded more accurately to novel views of an object than did pigeons trained with only one view. This result held even when the novel views came from a rotational axis that was orthogonal to the training axis. These results do not accord with recognition processes involving mental rotation or direct interpolation. Pigeons trained with five views may have formed a view-invariant representation [Psychol. Rev. 94 (1987) 115; Vision Res. 39 (1999) 2885]; alternatively, they may have acquired a more detailed shape space of the objects in which to measure object similarity [Representation and recognition in vision, MIT Press, MA, 1999], or learned to attend to a broader range of features of each object [J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 54 (1990) 69].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12169424     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00128-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  6 in total

1.  Visual object categorization in birds and primates: integrating behavioral, neurobiological, and computational evidence within a "general process" framework.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  View-invariance learning in object recognition by pigeons depends on error-driven associative learning processes.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Jeffrey Y M Siow; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Limits of dynamic object perception in pigeons: dynamic stimulus presentation does not enhance perception and discrimination of complex shape.

Authors:  Michaela Loidolt; Ulrike Aust; Michael Steurer; Nikolaus F Troje; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Dynamic object recognition in pigeons and humans.

Authors:  Marcia L Spetch; Alinda Friedman; Quoc C Vuong
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Using the reassignment procedure to test object representation in pigeons and people.

Authors:  Jessie J Peissig; Yasuo Nagasaka; Michael E Young; Edward A Wasserman; Irving Biederman
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Mechanisms of object recognition: what we have learned from pigeons.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.492

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.