Literature DB >> 16812680

Motion as a natural category for pigeons: Generalization and a feature-positive effect.

W H Dittrich, S E Lea.   

Abstract

Three groups of pigeons were trained with a modified discriminative autoshaping procedure to discriminate video images of other pigeons on the basis of movement. Birds of all groups were shown the same video images of other pigeons, which were either moving or still. The group to whom food was presented only after moving images learned the discrimination very quickly. A second group, to whom food was given only after still images, and a pseudocategory group, to whom food was presented after arbitrarily chosen stimuli, showed no evidence of discrimination during acquisition training. Extinction conditions led to clear differences in peck rates to moving and still images in the second group but not in the pseudocategory group. The result is related to the feature-positive effect. Generalization tests showed that the discrimination performance was based on visual features of the stimuli but was invariant against changes of size, perspective, brightness, and color. Furthermore, discrimination was maintained when novel images of pigeons under different viewing angles and seven other types of motion categories were presented. It is argued that the discrimination is based not on a common motion feature but on motion concepts or high-order generalization across motion categories.

Year:  1993        PMID: 16812680      PMCID: PMC1322079          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  12 in total

1.  COMPLEX VISUAL CONCEPT IN THE PIGEON.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN; D H LOVELAND
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-10-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation.

Authors:  E Gamzu; B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Choosing among natural stimuli.

Authors:  W Vaughan; R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Detection of the velocity of movement of visual stimuli by pigeons?

Authors:  W Hodos; L Smith; J C Bonbright
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Extinction reveals stimulus control: latent learning of feature-negative discriminations in pigeons.

Authors:  E Hearst
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1987-01

6.  The pigeon's discrimination of movement patterns (Lissajous figures) and contour-dependent rotational invariance.

Authors:  J Emmerton
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Apparent movement detection in the pigeon.

Authors:  R K Siegel
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Effect of proximity of elements on the feature-positive effect.

Authors:  R S Sainsbury
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Stimulus control of the pigeon's ability to peck a moving target.

Authors:  R Pisacreta
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Velocity discrimination by pigeons.

Authors:  P Mulvanny
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  14 in total

1.  Writing and overwriting short-term memory.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

2.  Categorizing a moving target in terms of its speed, direction, or both.

Authors:  Walter T Herbranson; Thane Fremouw; Charles P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The formation of a generalized categorization repertoire: effect of training with multiple domains, samples, and comparisons.

Authors:  Lanny Fields; Kenneth F Reeve; Priya Matneja; Antonios Varelas; James Belanich; Adrienne Fitzer; Kim Shamoun
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The structure of pigeon multiple-class same-different learning.

Authors:  Robert G Cook
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Discrimination of direction of movements in pigeons following previous experience of motion/static discrimination.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Goto; Stephen E G Lea
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Visual control of an action discrimination in pigeons.

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; Yael Asen; Robert G Cook
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Do rats (Rattus norvegicus) perceive biological motion?

Authors:  Laura M MacKinnon; Nikolaus F Troje; Hans C Dringenberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Limits of dynamic object perception in pigeons: dynamic stimulus presentation does not enhance perception and discrimination of complex shape.

Authors:  Michaela Loidolt; Ulrike Aust; Michael Steurer; Nikolaus F Troje; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Naïve Definitions of Action and Inaction: The Continuum, Spread, and Valence of Behaviors.

Authors:  Kathleen C McCulloch; Hong Li; Sungjin Hong; Dolores Albarracin
Journal:  Eur J Soc Psychol       Date:  2012-03

10.  Active change detection by pigeons and humans.

Authors:  Carl Erick Hagmann; Robert G Cook
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2013-07-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.