Literature DB >> 16783558

Fixation offset and stop signal intensity effects on saccadic countermanding: a crossmodal investigation.

Sharon Morein-Zamir1, Alan Kingstone.   

Abstract

Two experiments utilized the stop signal paradigm to examine whether fixation offset and stop signal intensity influenced saccadic inhibition. There was a robust fixation offset effect on saccadic latencies. However, contrary to expectations, fixation offset did not influence saccadic inhibition latencies. Importantly, saccadic inhibition latencies were found to be influenced by stop signal salience, with a more intense signal leading to faster stopping. This pattern of results was observed whether the stop signal was presented in the visual or auditory modality. The results provide new insights into the mechanisms of inhibition and help resolve previous inconsistencies in the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16783558     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0564-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  38 in total

1.  Performance monitoring by the supplementary eye field.

Authors:  V Stuphorn; T L Taylor; J D Schall
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-12-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Don't look! Don't touch! Inhibitory control of eye and hand movements.

Authors:  G D Logan; D E Irwin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

3.  Countermanding saccades with auditory stop signals: testing the race model.

Authors:  H Colonius; J Ozyurt; P A Arndt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Control of saccade initiation in a countermanding task using visual and auditory stop signals.

Authors:  D W Cabel; I T Armstrong; E Reingold; D P Munoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Cancelling of pursuit and saccadic eye movements in humans and monkeys.

Authors:  Krista Kornylo; Natalie Dill; Melissa Saenz; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Contrast, probability, and saccadic latency; evidence for independence of detection and decision.

Authors:  R H S Carpenter
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  The magnitude of the fixation offset effect with endogenously and exogenously controlled saccades.

Authors:  K Forbes; R M Klein
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Effects of target luminance and cue validity on the latency of visual detection.

Authors:  H L Hawkins; M G Shafto; K Richardson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-11

9.  Fixation cells in monkey superior colliculus. I. Characteristics of cell discharge.

Authors:  D P Munoz; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Countermanding saccades in humans.

Authors:  D P Hanes; R H Carpenter
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  15 in total

1.  The presence of visual gap affects the duration of stopping process.

Authors:  Giovanni Mirabella; Pierpaolo Pani; Stefano Ferraina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Functional distinction between visuomovement and movement neurons in macaque frontal eye field during saccade countermanding.

Authors:  Supriya Ray; Pierre Pouget; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Measurement of the extraocular spike potential during saccade countermanding.

Authors:  David C Godlove; Anna K Garr; Geoffrey F Woodman; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Express saccades during a countermanding task.

Authors:  Steven P Errington; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Dimensional bias and adaptive adjustments in inhibitory control of monkeys.

Authors:  Sadegh Ghasemian; Marzieh M Vardanjani; Vahid Sheibani; Farshad A Mansouri
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Visual salience of the stop-signal affects movement suppression process.

Authors:  Roberto Montanari; Margherita Giamundo; Emiliano Brunamonti; Stefano Ferraina; Pierpaolo Pani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Sensorimotor-independent prefrontal activity during response inhibition.

Authors:  Weidong Cai; Christopher J Cannistraci; John C Gore; Hoi-Chung Leung
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 8.  Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  On the role of the striatum in response inhibition.

Authors:  Bram B Zandbelt; Matthijs Vink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dissociation of Medial Frontal β-Bursts and Executive Control.

Authors:  Steven P Errington; Geoffrey F Woodman; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.