Literature DB >> 33097634

Dissociation of Medial Frontal β-Bursts and Executive Control.

Steven P Errington1, Geoffrey F Woodman1, Jeffrey D Schall2.   

Abstract

The neural mechanisms of executive and motor control concern both basic researchers and clinicians. In human studies, preparation and cancellation of movements are accompanied by changes in the β-frequency band (15-29 Hz) of electroencephalogram (EEG). Previous studies with human participants performing stop signal (countermanding) tasks have described reduced frequency of transient β-bursts over sensorimotor cortical areas before movement initiation and increased β-bursting over medial frontal areas with movement cancellation. This modulation has been interpreted as contributing to the trial-by-trial control of behavior. We performed identical analyses of EEG recorded over the frontal lobe of macaque monkeys (one male, one female) performing a saccade countermanding task. While we replicate the occurrence and modulation of β-bursts associated with initiation and cancellation of saccades, we found that β-bursts occur too infrequently to account for the observed stopping behavior. We also found β-bursts were more common after errors, but their incidence was unrelated to response time (RT) adaptation. These results demonstrate the homology of this EEG signature between humans and macaques but raise questions about the current interpretation of β band functional significance.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The finding of increased β-bursting over medial frontal cortex with movement cancellation in humans is difficult to reconcile with the finding of modulation too late to contribute to movement cancellation in medial frontal cortex of macaque monkeys. To obtain comparable measurement scales, we recorded electroencephalogram (EEG) over medial frontal cortex of macaques performing a stop signal (countermanding) task. We replicated the occurrence and modulation of β-bursts associated with the cancellation of movements, but we found that β-bursts occur too infrequently to account for observed stopping behavior. Unfortunately, this finding raises doubts whether β-bursts can be a causal mechanism of response inhibition, which impacts future applications in devices such as brain-machine interfaces.
Copyright © 2020 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; countermanding; error monitoring; response inhibition; stop signal; stopping

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33097634      PMCID: PMC7687065          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2072-20.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  83 in total

1.  ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task.

Authors:  Albert Kok; Jennifer R Ramautar; Michiel B De Ruiter; Guido P H Band; K Richard Ridderinkhof
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Conflict in cingulate cortex function between humans and macaque monkeys: More apparent than real.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Schall; Erik E Emeric
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 1.808

3.  Fixation offset and stop signal intensity effects on saccadic countermanding: a crossmodal investigation.

Authors:  Sharon Morein-Zamir; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Reliability of triggering inhibitory process is a better predictor of impulsivity than SSRT.

Authors:  Patrick Skippen; Dora Matzke; Andrew Heathcote; William Ross Fulham; Patricia Michie; Frini Karayanidis
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2018-11-21

5.  Neural aftereffects of errors in a stop-signal task.

Authors:  Frederike Beyer; Thomas F Münte; Julia Fischer; Ulrike M Krämer
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control.

Authors:  R De Jong; M G Coles; G D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Frontal midline theta reflects anxiety and cognitive control: meta-analytic evidence.

Authors:  James F Cavanagh; Alexander J Shackman
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2014-04-29

8.  Medial Frontal Theta Is Entrained to Rewarded Actions.

Authors:  Linda M Amarante; Marcelo S Caetano; Mark Laubach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The Frontal Control of Stopping.

Authors:  Ashwani Jha; Parashkev Nachev; Gareth Barnes; Masud Husain; Peter Brown; Vladimir Litvak
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Countermanding Perceptual Decision-Making.

Authors:  Paul G Middlebrooks; Bram B Zandbelt; Gordon D Logan; Thomas J Palmeri; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2019-12-18
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Towards real-world generalizability of a circuit for action-stopping.

Authors:  Ricci Hannah; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Double-blind disruption of right inferior frontal cortex with TMS reduces right frontal beta power for action stopping.

Authors:  Kelsey K Sundby; Sumitash Jana; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Reactive and Proactive Adaptation of Cognitive and Motor Neural Signals during Performance of a Stop-Change Task.

Authors:  Adam T Brockett; Matthew R Roesch
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-11

4.  Cortico-subcortical β burst dynamics underlying movement cancellation in humans.

Authors:  Darcy A Diesburg; Jeremy Dw Greenlee; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 8.140

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.