Literature DB >> 18822313

Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms.

Frederick Verbruggen1, Gordon D Logan.   

Abstract

The stop-signal paradigm is very useful for the study of response inhibition. Stop-signal performance is typically described as a race between a go process, triggered by a go stimulus, and a stop process, triggered by the stop signal. Response inhibition depends on the relative finishing time of these two processes. Numerous studies have shown that the independent horse-race model of Logan and Cowan [Logan, G.D., Cowan, W.B., 1984. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control. Psychological Review 91, 295-327] accounts for the data very well. In the present article, we review the independent horse-race model and related models, such as the interactive horse-race model [Boucher, L., Palmeri, T.J., Logan, G.D., Schall, J.D., 2007. Inhibitory control in mind and brain: an interactive race model of countermanding saccades. Psychological Review 114, 376-397]. We present evidence that favors the independent horse-race model but also some evidence that challenges the model. We end with a discussion of recent models that elaborate the role of a stop process in inhibiting a response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18822313      PMCID: PMC2696813          DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  107 in total

1.  Don't look! Don't touch! Inhibitory control of eye and hand movements.

Authors:  G D Logan; D E Irwin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

2.  The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis.

Authors:  A Miyake; N P Friedman; M J Emerson; A H Witzki; A Howerter; T D Wager
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Cancelling of pursuit and saccadic eye movements in humans and monkeys.

Authors:  Krista Kornylo; Natalie Dill; Melissa Saenz; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Developmental trends in simple and selective inhibition of compatible and incompatible responses.

Authors:  Wery P M van den Wildenberg; Maurits W van der Molen
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2004-03

5.  On the difference between response inhibition and negative priming: evidence from simple and selective stopping.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Baptist Liefooghe; André Vandierendonck
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-06-26

Review 6.  The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control.

Authors:  Adam R Aron
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.519

7.  Halting in Single Word Production: A Test of the Perceptual Loop Theory of Speech Monitoring.

Authors:  L Robert Slevc; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  In search of the point of no return: the control of response processes.

Authors:  Ritske de Jong; Michael G H Coles; Gordon D Logan; Gabriele Gratton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The ADHD response-inhibition deficit as measured by the stop task: replication with DSM-IV combined type, extension, and qualification.

Authors:  J T Nigg
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1999-10

10.  Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  249 in total

1.  Pinning down response inhibition in the brain--conjunction analyses of the Stop-signal task.

Authors:  C N Boehler; L G Appelbaum; R M Krebs; J M Hopf; M G Woldorff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Stress and alcohol cues exert conjoint effects on go and stop signal responding in male problem drinkers.

Authors:  Martin Zack; Tracy M Woodford; Anne M Tremblay; Lindsay Steinberg; Laurie A Zawertailo; Usoa E Busto
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  The role of the right presupplementary motor area in stopping action: two studies with event-related transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Weidong Cai; Jobi S George; Frederick Verbruggen; Christopher D Chambers; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Functional parcellation of the inferior frontal and midcingulate cortices in a flanker-stop-change paradigm.

Authors:  Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert; Tom Eichele; Karsten Specht; Harald Kugel; Christo Pantev; René J Huster
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Aging and inhibitory control of action: cortico-subthalamic connection strength predicts stopping performance.

Authors:  James P Coxon; Annouchka Van Impe; Nicole Wenderoth; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Theta burst stimulation dissociates attention and action updating in human inferior frontal cortex.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Adam R Aron; Michaël A Stevens; Christopher D Chambers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Prefrontal cortex and impulsive decision making.

Authors:  Soyoun Kim; Daeyeol Lee
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Associatively mediated stopping: Training stimulus-specific inhibitory control.

Authors:  William A Bowditch; Frederick Verbruggen; Ian P L McLaren
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition.

Authors:  Michael D Guthrie; Donald L Gilbert; David A Huddleston; Ernest V Pedapati; Paul S Horn; Stewart H Mostofsky; Steve W Wu
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 10.  Deep Brain Stimulation for Movement Disorders of Basal Ganglia Origin: Restoring Function or Functionality?

Authors:  Thomas Wichmann; Mahlon R DeLong
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.620

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.