Literature DB >> 10780023

Don't look! Don't touch! Inhibitory control of eye and hand movements.

G D Logan1, D E Irwin.   

Abstract

Inhibitory control of eye and hand movements was compared in the stop-signal task. Subjects moved their eyes to the right or left or pressed keys on the right or left in response to visual stimuli. The stimuli were either central (angle brackets pointing left or right) or peripheral (plus signs turning into Xs left or right of fixation), and the task was either pro (respond on the same side as the stimulus) or anti (respond on the opposite side). Occasionally, a stop signal was presented, which instructed subjects to inhibit their responses to the go stimulus. Stop-signal reaction times (SSRTs) were faster overall for eye movements than for hand movements, and they were affected differently by stimulus conditions (central vs. peripheral) and task (pro vs. anti), suggesting that the eyes and hands are inhibited by different processes operating under similar principles (i.e., a race between stop and go processes).

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10780023     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  14 in total

1.  On the synchrony of stopping motor responses and delaying heartbeats.

Authors:  J R Jennings; M W van der Molen; K Brock; R J Somsen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Does motor programming necessitate response execution?

Authors:  A Osman; S Kornblum; D E Meyer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy.

Authors:  S Kornblum; T Hasbroucq; A Osman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  In search of the point of no return: the control of response processes.

Authors:  Ritske de Jong; Michael G H Coles; Gordon D Logan; Gabriele Gratton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Role of frontal eye fields in countermanding saccades: visual, movement, and fixation activity.

Authors:  D P Hanes; W F Patterson; J D Schall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The point of no return in choice reaction time: controlled and ballistic stages of response preparation.

Authors:  A Osman; S Kornblum; D E Meyer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control.

Authors:  R De Jong; M G Coles; G D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  On the confounding effects of phosphor persistence in oscilloscopic displays.

Authors:  R Groner; M T Groner; P Müller; W F Bischof; V Di Lollo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  A high-speed point plotter for vision research.

Authors:  G Finley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  46 in total

1.  Inhibitory control of reaching movements in humans.

Authors:  Giovanni Mirabella; Pierpaolo Pani; Martin Paré; Stefano Ferraina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Event-related potentials elicited by errors during the stop-signal task. II: human effector-specific error responses.

Authors:  Robert M G Reinhart; Nancy B Carlisle; Min-Suk Kang; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Switch performance in peripherally and centrally triggered saccades.

Authors:  Astrid Vermeiren; Baptist Liefooghe; André Vandierendonck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Vocal response inhibition is enhanced by anodal tDCS over the right prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Leidy J Castro-Meneses; Blake W Johnson; Paul F Sowman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A common control signal and a ballistic stage can explain the control of coordinated eye-hand movements.

Authors:  Atul Gopal; Aditya Murthy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Function of striatum beyond inhibition and execution of motor responses.

Authors:  Matthijs Vink; René S Kahn; Mathijs Raemaekers; Martijn van den Heuvel; Maria Boersma; Nick F Ramsey
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Fixation offset and stop signal intensity effects on saccadic countermanding: a crossmodal investigation.

Authors:  Sharon Morein-Zamir; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Behavioral evaluation of movement cancellation.

Authors:  Mark M G Walton; Neeraj J Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Age deficits in the control of prepotent responses: evidence for an inhibitory decline.

Authors:  Karin M Butler; Rose T Zacks
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2006-09

10.  Input monitoring and response selection as components of executive control in pro-saccades and anti-saccades.

Authors:  André Vandierendonck; Maud Deschuyteneer; Ann Depoorter; Denis Drieghe
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-08-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.