Literature DB >> 28439628

Visual salience of the stop-signal affects movement suppression process.

Roberto Montanari1, Margherita Giamundo1, Emiliano Brunamonti1, Stefano Ferraina1, Pierpaolo Pani2,3.   

Abstract

We investigated how the ability to suppress an impending movement is affected by the visual salience of the stop-signal in a reaching countermanding task. We found that when the stop-signal was easy to detect, stop performance was better than when the stop-signal was difficult to detect. In an exploratory analysis, we also found that the change in salience of the stop-signal can have an effect on the speed of response in trials following the stop-signal. This effect occurred together with strategic slowing down after an error in inhibiting was committed and together with a repetition priming effect due to the stop-signal presented in the previous trial. Our results suggest the need to investigate more in depth the afferent processing stage of the inhibitory control of movement and how task demands can affect its functioning.

Keywords:  Arm control; Countermanding task; Movement inhibition; Visual salience; Visual stop

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28439628     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-4961-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  58 in total

1.  Saccadic countermanding: a comparison of central and peripheral stop signals.

Authors:  K N Asrress; R H Carpenter
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.

Authors:  M M Botvinick; T S Braver; D M Barch; C S Carter; J D Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Control of saccade initiation in a countermanding task using visual and auditory stop signals.

Authors:  D W Cabel; I T Armstrong; E Reingold; D P Munoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Post-stop-signal adjustments: inhibition improves subsequent inhibition.

Authors:  Patrick G Bissett; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  Inhibitory control in mind and brain: an interactive race model of countermanding saccades.

Authors:  Leanne Boucher; Thomas J Palmeri; Gordon D Logan; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Disentangling deficits in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Evelijne M Bekker; Carin C E Overtoom; J J Sandra Kooij; Jan K Buitelaar; Marinus N Verbaten; J Leon Kenemans
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2005-10

7.  Balancing cognitive demands: control adjustments in the stop-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Patrick G Bissett; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Controlled movement processing: evidence for a common inhibitory control of finger, wrist, and arm movements.

Authors:  E Brunamonti; S Ferraina; M Paré
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Inhibitory control of eye movements during oculomotor countermanding in adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  I T Armstrong; D P Munoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Dynamics of saccade target selection: race model analysis of double step and search step saccade production in human and macaque.

Authors:  C R Camalier; A Gotler; A Murthy; K G Thompson; G D Logan; T J Palmeri; J D Schall
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  5 in total

1.  Atrophic degeneration of cerebellum impairs both the reactive and the proactive control of movement in the stop signal paradigm.

Authors:  Giusy Olivito; Emiliano Brunamonti; Silvia Clausi; Pierpaolo Pani; Francesca R Chiricozzi; Margherita Giamundo; Marco Molinari; Maria Leggio; Stefano Ferraina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Neuronal Activity in the Premotor Cortex of Monkeys Reflects Both Cue Salience and Motivation for Action Generation and Inhibition.

Authors:  Margherita Giamundo; Franco Giarrocco; Emiliano Brunamonti; Francesco Fabbrini; Pierpaolo Pani; Stefano Ferraina
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  tDCS over the inferior frontal gyri and visual cortices did not improve response inhibition.

Authors:  Christina Thunberg; Mari S Messel; Liisa Raud; René J Huster
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Cortical sensorimotor activity in the execution and suppression of discrete and rhythmic movements.

Authors:  Mario Hervault; Pier-Giorgio Zanone; Jean-Christophe Buisson; Raoul Huys
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Visual salience of the stop signal affects the neuronal dynamics of controlled inhibition.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Pani; Franco Giarrocco; Margherita Giamundo; Roberto Montanari; Emiliano Brunamonti; Stefano Ferraina
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.