Literature DB >> 11412886

Countermanding saccades with auditory stop signals: testing the race model.

H Colonius1, J Ozyurt, P A Arndt.   

Abstract

In a stop signal paradigm to investigate the control of human saccades subjects were instructed to make a saccade to a visual target appearing suddenly l5 degrees to the left or to the right of the fixation point. In 25% of the trials an auditory stop signal was presented after a variable delay that required the subject to inhibit the saccade. The stop signal was presented randomly at the target position, at the opposite side, or at fixation. Using different estimation techniques the average time needed to inhibit a saccade (stop signal processing time, or SSPT) was estimated on the basis of the race model. The SSPT estimates ranging from 50 to 100 ms (depending on subject) are shorter than those from previous studies with visual stop signals. Position of the auditory stop signal did not show an effect on countermanding effectiveness. We found saccadic response times consistent with the race model predictions for two subjects, while a third subject showed small but consistent violations. Moreover, all subjects showed a tendency towards hypometric saccades for responses that could not be inhibited. These findings are discussed with respect to recent neurophysiological results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11412886     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00084-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  26 in total

1.  Inhibitory control of reaching movements in humans.

Authors:  Giovanni Mirabella; Pierpaolo Pani; Martin Paré; Stefano Ferraina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  At what stage of manual visual reaction time does interhemispheric transmission occur: controlled or ballistic?

Authors:  C Cavina-Pratesi; E Bricolo; B Pellegrini; C A Marzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of motivational conflicts on visually elicited saccades in monkeys.

Authors:  Katsumi Watanabe; Johan Lauwereyns; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Event-related potentials elicited by errors during the stop-signal task. II: human effector-specific error responses.

Authors:  Robert M G Reinhart; Nancy B Carlisle; Min-Suk Kang; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Fore-period effect and stop-signal reaction time.

Authors:  Chiang-Shan Ray Li; John H Krystal; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Fixation offset and stop signal intensity effects on saccadic countermanding: a crossmodal investigation.

Authors:  Sharon Morein-Zamir; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Behavioral evaluation of movement cancellation.

Authors:  Mark M G Walton; Neeraj J Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Influence of history on saccade countermanding performance in humans and macaque monkeys.

Authors:  Erik E Emeric; Joshua W Brown; Leanne Boucher; Roger H S Carpenter; Doug P Hanes; Robin Harris; Gordon D Logan; Reena N Mashru; Martin Paré; Pierre Pouget; Veit Stuphorn; Tracy L Taylor; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Visual-tactile saccadic inhibition.

Authors:  Annika Akerfelt; Hans Colonius; Adele Diederich
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The countermanding task revisited: fast stimulus detection is a key determinant of psychophysical performance.

Authors:  Emilio Salinas; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.