Literature DB >> 20649235

Conversational and clear speech intelligibility of /bVd/ syllables produced by native and non-native English speakers.

Catherine L Rogers1, Teresa M DeMasi, Jean C Krause.   

Abstract

The ability of native and non-native speakers to enhance intelligibility of target vowels by speaking clearly was compared across three talker groups: monolingual English speakers and native Spanish speakers with either an earlier or a later age of immersion in an English-speaking environment. Talkers produced the target syllables "bead, bid, bayed, bed, bad" and "bod" in 'conversational' and clear speech styles. The stimuli were presented to native English-speaking listeners in multi-talker babble with signal-to-noise ratios of -8 dB for the monolingual and early learners and -4 dB for the later learners. The monolinguals and early learners of English showed a similar average clear speech benefit, and the early learners showed equal or greater intelligibility than monolinguals for most target vowels. The 4-dB difference in signal-to-noise ratio yielded approximately equal average intelligibility for the monolinguals and later learners. The average clear speech benefit was smallest for the later learners, and a significant clear speech decrement was obtained for the target syllable "bid." These results suggest that later learners of English as a second language may be less able than monolinguals to accommodate listeners in noisy environments, due to a reduced ability to improve intelligibility by speaking more clearly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20649235      PMCID: PMC2921438          DOI: 10.1121/1.3436523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  23 in total

1.  The clear speech effect for non-native listeners.

Authors:  Ann R Bradlow; Tessa Bent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Sarah Hargus Ferguson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish listeners.

Authors:  Satomi Imai; Amanda C Walley; James E Flege
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effect of masker type on native and non-native consonant perception in noise.

Authors:  M L Garcia Lecumberri; Martin Cooke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs.

Authors:  Roger Bakeman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-08

6.  Acoustic variability within and across German, French, and American English vowels: phonetic context effects.

Authors:  Winifred Strange; Andrea Weber; Erika S Levy; Valeriy Shafiro; Miwako Hisagi; Kanae Nishi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: acoustic characteristics of vowels.

Authors:  Sarah Hargus Ferguson; Diane Kewley-Port
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners.

Authors:  Ann R Bradlow; Jennifer A Alexander
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise.

Authors:  L H Mayo; M Florentine; S Buus
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Sarah Hargus Ferguson; Diane Kewley-Port
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  7 in total

1.  Bidirectional clear speech perception benefit for native and high-proficiency non-native talkers and listeners: intelligibility and accentedness.

Authors:  Rajka Smiljanić; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Talker Differences in Clear and Conversational Speech: Perceived Sentence Clarity for Young Adults With Normal Hearing and Older Adults With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Sarah Hargus Ferguson; Shae D Morgan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  The Effect of Talker and Listener Depressive Symptoms on Speech Intelligibility.

Authors:  Hoyoung Yi; Rajka Smiljanic; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Acoustics of clear speech: effect of instruction.

Authors:  Jennifer Lam; Kris Tjaden; Greg Wilding
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Gender difference in speech intelligibility using speech intelligibility tests and acoustic analyses.

Authors:  Ho-Beom Kwon
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  The Clear-Speech Benefit for School-Age Children: Speech-in-Noise and Speech-in-Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Heather L Porter; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Face masks and speaking style affect audio-visual word recognition and memory of native and non-native speech.

Authors:  Rajka Smiljanic; Sandie Keerstock; Kirsten Meemann; Sarah M Ransom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.840

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.