Literature DB >> 30823795

Error patterns of native and non-native listeners' perception of speech in noise.

Benjamin D Zinszer1, Meredith Riggs2, Rachel Reetzke2, Bharath Chandrasekaran3.   

Abstract

Speech perception in noise requires both bottom-up sampling of the stimulus and top-down reconstruction of the masked signal from a language model. Previous studies have provided mixed evidence about the exact role that linguistic knowledge plays in native and non-native listeners' perception of masked speech. This paper describes an analysis of whole utterance, content word, and morphosyntactic error patterns to test the prediction that non-native listeners are uniquely affected by energetic and informational masks because of limited information at multiple linguistic levels. The results reveal a consistent disadvantage for non-native listeners at all three levels in challenging listening environments.

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30823795      PMCID: PMC6365288          DOI: 10.1121/1.5087271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  Effect of masker type on native and non-native consonant perception in noise.

Authors:  M L Garcia Lecumberri; Martin Cooke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Martin Cooke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners.

Authors:  Ann R Bradlow; Jennifer A Alexander
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Variability and uncertainty in masking by competing speech.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Karen S Helfer; Uma Balakrishnan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The foreign language cocktail party problem: Energetic and informational masking effects in non-native speech perception.

Authors:  Martin Cooke; M L Garcia Lecumberri; Jon Barker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.

Authors:  Douglas S Brungart; Peter S Chang; Brian D Simpson; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The Wildcat Corpus of native- and foreign-accented English: communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Melissa Baese-Berk; Rachel E Baker; Arim Choi; Midam Kim; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.500

8.  Native-language benefit for understanding speech-in-noise: The contribution of semantics.

Authors:  Narly Golestani; Stuart Rosen; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2009-07

9.  Effects of speech clarity on recognition memory for spoken sentences.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Rajka Smiljanic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances.

Authors:  Jerker Rönnberg; Thomas Lunner; Adriana Zekveld; Patrik Sörqvist; Henrik Danielsson; Björn Lyxell; Orjan Dahlström; Carine Signoret; Stefan Stenfelt; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Mary Rudner
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-13
View more
  3 in total

1.  Older adult recognition error patterns when listening to interrupted speech and speech in steady-state noise.

Authors:  Kimberly G Smith; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Phonological and semantic similarity of misperceived words in babble: Effects of sentence context, age, and hearing loss.

Authors:  Blythe Vickery; Daniel Fogerty; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Impact of depression on speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Benjamin D Zinszer; Meredith Riggs; Christopher G Beevers; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.