Literature DB >> 16598529

A hybrid approach for quantification of aortic valve stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography: comparison to right heart catheterization and standard echocardiography.

D Haghi1, T Suselbeck, S Fluechter, G Kalmar, M Schroder, J J Kaden, T Poerner, M Borggrefe, T Papavassiliu.   

Abstract

We replaced Doppler-derived stroke volume in the continuity equation (method A) by either right heart catheterization-derived stroke volume (method B) or cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived stroke volume (method C) to calculate aortic valve area in 20 consecutive patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis. Comparison of both hybrid methods (methods B and C) by Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference near zero, a spread within two standard deviations and very similar limits of agreement. More importantly, all patients were classified into the same category of severity by both methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16598529     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-006-0355-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol        ISSN: 1861-0684            Impact factor:   5.460


  28 in total

1.  Contrast agent increases Doppler velocities and improves reproducibility of aortic valve area measurements in patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Lindsay A Smith; S Joanna Cowell; Audrey C White; Nicholas A Boon; David E Newby; David B Northridge
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.251

2.  Assessment of cardiac function by three-dimensional echocardiography compared with conventional noninvasive methods.

Authors:  A S Gopal; Z Shen; P M Sapin; A M Keller; M J Schnellbaecher; D W Leibowitz; O O Akinboboye; R A Rodney; D K Blood; D L King
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Transgastric Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the severity of aortic stenosis using multiplane transesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  F C Blumberg; M Pfeifer; S R Holmer; E P Kromer; G A Riegger; D Elsner
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Comparison of multiplane and biplane transesophageal echocardiography in the assessment of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  K S Kim; W Maxted; N C Nanda; K Coggins; D Roychoudhry; M Espinal; P Fan; A Camino; R Sanyal; A Finch; J Kirklin; A Pacifico
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Simultaneous determination of aortic valve area by the Gorlin formula and by transesophageal echocardiography under different transvalvular flow conditions. Evidence that anatomic aortic valve area does not change with variations in flow in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  J C Tardif; A G Rodrigues; J F Hardy; Y Leclerc; R Petitclerc; R Mongrain; L A Mercier
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: prospective Doppler-catheterization correlation in 100 patients.

Authors:  J K Oh; C P Taliercio; D R Holmes; G S Reeder; K R Bailey; J B Seward; A J Tajik
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Determination of the stenotic aortic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  C M Otto; A S Pearlman; K A Comess; R P Reamer; C L Janko; L L Huntsman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Comparison of two- and three-dimensional echocardiography with cineventriculography for measurement of left ventricular volume in patients.

Authors:  P M Sapin; K M Schröder; A S Gopal; M D Smith; A N DeMaria; D L King
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Accurate noninvasive quantification of stenotic aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  W A Zoghbi; K L Farmer; J G Soto; J G Nelson; M A Quinones
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Instantaneous pressure gradient: a simultaneous Doppler and dual catheter correlative study.

Authors:  P J Currie; D J Hagler; J B Seward; G S Reeder; D A Fyfe; A A Bove; A J Tajik
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  11 in total

1.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: an essential diagnostic aid in suspected myocardial re-infarction in a 40 year old woman.

Authors:  Günter Pilz; Peter Bernhardt; Elisabeth Harrer; Markus Klos; Berthold Höfling
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  Real-time transesophageal three-dimensional echocardiography for guidance of percutaneous cardiac interventions: first experience.

Authors:  Jan Balzer; Harald Kühl; Tienush Rassaf; Rainer Hoffmann; Patrick Schauerte; Malte Kelm; Andreas Franke
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Clinical implication of adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as potential gatekeeper prior to invasive examination in patients with AHA/ACC class II indication for coronary angiography.

Authors:  Guenter Pilz; Peter Bernhardt; Markus Klos; Eman Ali; Michael Wild; Berthold Höfling
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Prevalence and prognostic impact of comorbidities in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  Christian Bruch; Daniela Kauling; Holger Reinecke; Markus Rothenburger; Hans Heinrich Scheld; Günter Breithardt; Thomas Wichter
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Evaluation of aortic stenosis severity using 4D flow jet shear layer detection for the measurement of valve effective orifice area.

Authors:  Julio Garcia; Michael Markl; Susanne Schnell; Bradley Allen; Pegah Entezari; Riti Mahadevia; S Chris Malaisrie; Philippe Pibarot; James Carr; Alex J Barker
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Revival of an old method with new techniques: balloon aortic valvuloplasty of the calcified aortic stenosis in the elderly.

Authors:  Stefan Sack; Philipp Kahlert; Sasan Khandanpour; Christoph Naber; Sebastian Philipp; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Burkhard Sievers; Hagen Kälsch; Raimund Erbel
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Quantification of congenital aortic valve stenosis in pediatric patients: comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Selma Sirin; Kai Nassenstein; Ulrich Neudorf; Christoph J Jensen; Christian Mikat; Thomas Schlosser
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for the estimation of effective orifice area in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Julio Garcia; Lyes Kadem; Eric Larose; Marie-Annick Clavel; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation of aortic stenosis severity using single plane measurement of effective orifice area.

Authors:  Julio Garcia; Oscar R Marrufo; Alfredo O Rodriguez; Eric Larose; Philippe Pibarot; Lyes Kadem
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 10.  Surgery for severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradient and poor left ventricular function -- a single centre experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Andreas Borowski; Ali Ghodsizad; Ilja Vchivkov; Emmeran Gams
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.