Literature DB >> 14981423

Contrast agent increases Doppler velocities and improves reproducibility of aortic valve area measurements in patients with aortic stenosis.

Lindsay A Smith1, S Joanna Cowell, Audrey C White, Nicholas A Boon, David E Newby, David B Northridge.   

Abstract

Observer variability may limit assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler echocardiography. This study aimed to assess whether echocardiographic contrast agent improves reproducibility of aortic valve area (AVA) measurements for patients with aortic stenosis. In all, 20 patients with aortic stenosis (67 +/- 10 years old) underwent noncontrast and contrast Doppler echocardiography on 2 occasions, 3 weeks apart. Intraobserver and interobserver coefficients of reproducibility were 0.36 and 0.20 cm for left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter, and 0.38 and 0.24 cm(2) for AVA, respectively. Although intraobserver reproducibility was unaffected, contrast improved interobserver reproducibility for LVOT diameter (mean of differences -0.02 +/- 0.07 cm vs 0.01 +/- 0.10 cm, P <.05) and AVA (mean of differences 0.02 +/- 0.10 cm(2) vs 0.07 +/- 0.12 cm(2), P <.05). Prevalve and postvalve velocities were increased with contrast compared with noncontrast imaging (prevalve, 1.07 +/- 0.20 vs 0.94 +/- 0.19 m/s, P <.01; postvalve, 3.76 +/- 0.87 vs 3.47 +/- 0.78 m/s, P <.01). We conclude that contrast significantly increases Doppler velocities and produces modest improvements in reproducibility of LVOT diameter and AVA. We suggest that, when assessing patients with aortic stenosis, contrast agents should be considered in patients who are difficult to image with poor baseline LVOT images or Doppler studies, or where there is poor interobserver reproducibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14981423     DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2003.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  1 in total

1.  A hybrid approach for quantification of aortic valve stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography: comparison to right heart catheterization and standard echocardiography.

Authors:  D Haghi; T Suselbeck; S Fluechter; G Kalmar; M Schroder; J J Kaden; T Poerner; M Borggrefe; T Papavassiliu
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 5.460

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.