Literature DB >> 17066348

Prevalence and prognostic impact of comorbidities in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.

Christian Bruch1, Daniela Kauling, Holger Reinecke, Markus Rothenburger, Hans Heinrich Scheld, Günter Breithardt, Thomas Wichter.   

Abstract

In patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (valve area <or= 1 cm(2), AS), the prevalence and the prognostic impact of comorbidities is unknown. Fifty-eight patients with severe AS (mean aortic valve area 0.8 +/- 0.2 cm(2)), who underwent cardiac catheterization and 2-D/Doppler echocardiography, were prospectively enrolled. The glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was estimated using the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation. Death from a cardiac cause was defined as study end point. Coronary artery disease was present in 33 patients (57%). Subsequently, 43 patients (77%) underwent aortic valve replacement. During a follow-up of 485 +/- 336 days, 11 patients suffered a cardiac death. Survivors and non-survivors did not differ with respect the prevalence of coronary artery disease, invasive hemodynamic measurements or echocardiographic variables of systolic/diastolic function. Non-survivors were in a poorer NYHA functional class (3.2 +/- 0.3 vs 2.4+/-0.8, p = 0.002), had a lower eGFR (33.4 +/- 15.5 ml/min/1.73 m(2) vs 49.1 +/- 15.6 ml/min/1.73m(2), p = 0.004), a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (73% vs. 22%, p = 0.0001) and a lower serum hemoglobin level (11.6 +/- 2.1 vs 13.0 +/- 1.5 g/dL, p = 0.017). By multivariate Cox analysis, NYHA class (hazard ratio: 6.17, p = 0.013) and eGFR (hazard ratio 0.95, p = 0.04) were independent prognostic predictors. In patients with eGFR < 41.8 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (cut-off value derived from ROC analysis, area under the curve: 0.78 +/- 0.08), outcome was markedly poorer as compared to patients with eGFR > 41.8 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (event-free survival rate of 38% vs 93%, p = 0.004). Thus, in patients with severe AS, comorbidities are frequent, and particularly kidney disease significantly impacts longterm outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17066348     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-006-0452-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol        ISSN: 1861-0684            Impact factor:   5.460


  22 in total

1.  Why angina in aortic stenosis with normal coronary arteriograms?

Authors:  K Lance Gould; Blase A Carabello
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  The severe cardiorenal syndrome: 'Guyton revisited'.

Authors:  Lennart G Bongartz; Maarten Jan Cramer; Pieter A Doevendans; Jaap A Joles; Branko Braam
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 4.  Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms.

Authors:  N B Schiller; P M Shah; M Crawford; A DeMaria; R Devereux; H Feigenbaum; H Gutgesell; N Reichek; D Sahn; I Schnittger
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.251

5.  Outcome of 622 adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis during prolonged follow-up.

Authors:  Patricia A Pellikka; Maurice E Sarano; Rick A Nishimura; Joseph F Malouf; Kent R Bailey; Christopher G Scott; Marion E Barnes; A Jamil Tajik
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  The natural history of aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  D Horstkotte; F Loogen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Observed and relative survival after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  P Kvidal; R Bergström; L G Hörte; E Ståhle
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Bicuspid aortic valve: evaluation of the ability to participate in competitive sports: case reports of two soccer players.

Authors:  Jürgen Scharhag; T Meyer; I Kindermann; G Schneider; A Urhausen; W Kindermann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 5.460

9.  A hybrid approach for quantification of aortic valve stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography: comparison to right heart catheterization and standard echocardiography.

Authors:  D Haghi; T Suselbeck; S Fluechter; G Kalmar; M Schroder; J J Kaden; T Poerner; M Borggrefe; T Papavassiliu
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 5.460

10.  A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group.

Authors:  A S Levey; J P Bosch; J B Lewis; T Greene; N Rogers; D Roth
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  4 in total

1.  Revival of an old method with new techniques: balloon aortic valvuloplasty of the calcified aortic stenosis in the elderly.

Authors:  Stefan Sack; Philipp Kahlert; Sasan Khandanpour; Christoph Naber; Sebastian Philipp; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Burkhard Sievers; Hagen Kälsch; Raimund Erbel
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  The bicuspid aortic valve and its relation to aortic dilation.

Authors:  Shi-Min Yuan; Hua Jing; Jacob Lavee
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.365

3.  Eight-year follow-up after prospectively randomized implantation of different mechanical aortic valves.

Authors:  Sven Lehmann; Thomas Walther; Sergey Leontyev; Jörg Kempfert; Ardawan Rastan; Volkmar Falk; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Can postoperative mean transprosthetic pressure gradient predict survival after aortic valve replacement?

Authors:  Bart M Koene; Mohamed A Soliman Hamad; Wobbe Bouma; Massimo A Mariani; Kathinka C Peels; Jan-Melle van Dantzig; Albert H van Straten
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 5.460

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.