Literature DB >> 24343730

Quantification of congenital aortic valve stenosis in pediatric patients: comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography.

Selma Sirin1, Kai Nassenstein, Ulrich Neudorf, Christoph J Jensen, Christian Mikat, Thomas Schlosser.   

Abstract

Previous studies showed the reliability of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) in the quantification of aortic valve stenosis in adults. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the ability of cMRI in the quantification of congenital aortic valve stenosis (CAS) in children. Nineteen patients (mean age 14.0 ± 3.2 years, 15 boys and 4 girls) with CAS were imaged by cMRI and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). cMRI was performed on a 1.5-Tesla MR scanner (Magnetom Avanto; Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) using cine steady-state free precession sequences for the assessment of the aortic valve area (AVA) by MR planimetry and left-ventricular function. Phase-contrast measurement was used in cMRI to assess peak flow velocity above the aortic valve. A positive correlation was found between maximum systolic pressure gradient (MPG) as assessed by cMRI and TTE (28.9 ± 21.2 vs. 41.3 ± 22.7 mmHg, r = 0.84, p = 0.001) with a mean underestimation of 12.4 mmHg by cMRI. Only a weak correlation could be observed between AVA by cMRI and MPG at the aortic valve by TTE (r = -0.50, p = 0.029) and cMRI (r = -0.27, p = 0.40). Furthermore, a positive correlation between myocardial mass (cMRI) and MPG (TTE, r = 0.57, p = 0.01), but not between myocardial mass (cMRI) and AVA (cMRI, r = 0.07, p = 0.77), was found. The assessment of MPG by cMRI in patients with CAS is feasible with a trend toward underestimatation compared with TTE. Moreover, MPG seems to be a more accurate parameter than AVA regarding the prediction of myocardial hypertrophy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24343730     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-013-0851-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  25 in total

1.  Assessment of left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement--cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus M-mode echocardiography.

Authors:  Kim Rajappan; Nicholas G Bellenger; Giovanni Melina; Marco Di Terlizzi; Magdi H Yacoub; Desmond J Sheridan; Dudley J Pennell
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Systemic pressure does not directly affect pressure gradient and valve area estimates in aortic stenosis in vitro.

Authors:  Julia Mascherbauer; Christina Fuchs; Martin Stoiber; Heinrich Schima; Elisabeth Pernicka; Gerald Maurer; Helmut Baumgartner
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography is as good as magnetic resonance imaging in measuring dynamic changes in left ventricular volume during the heart cycle in children.

Authors:  T Poutanen; A Ikonen; E Jokinen; P Vainio; T Tikanoja
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2001-03

4.  Quantification of aortic valve stenosis in MRI-comparison of steady-state free precession and fast low-angle shot sequences.

Authors:  Thomas Schlosser; Nasser Malyar; Markus Jochims; Frank Breuckmann; Peter Hunold; Oliver Bruder; Raimund Erbel; Jörg Barkhausen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Risk stratification in cardiac amyloidosis: novel approaches.

Authors:  Arnt V Kristen; F Joachim Meyer; Jolanta B Perz; Stefan O Schonland; Michael Hundemer; Ute Hegenbart; Reinhard Singer; Philipp A Schnabel; Falk-Udo Sack; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Hugo A Katus; Thomas J Dengler
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Systemic hypertension in low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Mackram F Eleid; Rick A Nishimura; Paul Sorajja; Barry A Borlaug
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Aortic valve area discrepancy by Gorlin equation and Doppler echocardiography continuity equation: relationship to flow in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.

Authors:  I G Burwash; A Dickinson; R J Teskey; J W Tam; K L Chan
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.223

8.  Aortic valvuloplasty in pediatric patients substantially postpones the need for aortic valve surgery: a single-center experience of 188 patients after up to 17.5 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Sohrab Fratz; Hans Peter Gildein; Gunter Balling; Walter Sebening; Thomas Genz; Andreas Eicken; John Hess
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Determination of peak velocity in stenotic areas: echocardiography versus k-t SENSE accelerated MR Fourier velocity encoding.

Authors:  Christof Baltes; Michael S Hansen; Jeffrey Tsao; Sebastian Kozerke; Reza Rezavi; Erik M Pedersen; Peter Boesiger
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Correlation of aortic valve area obtained by the velocity-encoded phase contrast continuity method to direct planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Kaoru Tanaka; Amgad N Makaryus; Steven D Wolff
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  1 in total

1.  A novel approach to determine aortic valve area with phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Felix Troger; Ivan Lechner; Martin Reindl; Christina Tiller; Magdalena Holzknecht; Mathias Pamminger; Christian Kremser; Johannes Schwaiger; Sebastian J Reinstadler; Axel Bauer; Bernhard Metzler; Agnes Mayr; Gert Klug
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.364

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.