Literature DB >> 16544073

Do all patients with abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram merit endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?

S Varadarajulu1, M A Eloubeidi, C M Wilcox, R H Hawes, P B Cotton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is commonly used for postoperative evaluation of an abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC). Although a normal IOC is very suggestive of a disease-free common bile duct (CBD), abnormal studies are associated with high false-positive rates. This study aimed to identify a subset of patients with abnormal IOC who would benefit from a postoperative ERCP.
METHODS: This prospective study investigated 51 patients with abnormal IOC at laparoscopic cholecystectomy who underwent postoperative ERCP at two tertiary referral centers over a 3-year period. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of CBD stones at postoperative ERCP.
RESULTS: For all 51 patients, ERCP was successful. The ERCP showed CBD stones in 33 cases (64.7%), and normal results in 18 cases (35.2%). On univariate analysis, abnormal liver function tests (p < 0.0001) as well as IOC findings of a large CBD stone (p = 0.03), multiple stones (p = 0.01), and a dilated CBD (p = 0.07) predicted the presence of retained stones at postoperative ERCP. However, on multivariable analysis, only abnormal liver function tests correlated with the presence of CBD stones (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: One-third of patients with an abnormal IOC have a normal postoperative ERCP. Elevated liver function tests can help to identify patients who merit further evaluation by ERCP. The use of less invasive methods such as endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography should be considered for patients with normal liver function tests to minimize unnecessary ERCPs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16544073     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0479-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  41 in total

1.  Evaluation of the predictors of choledocholithiasis: comparative analysis of clinical, biochemical, radiological, radionuclear, and intraoperative parameters.

Authors:  S M Bose; A Mazumdar; V S Prakash; R Kocher; S Katariya; C M Pathak
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Detection of choledocholithiasis with MR cholangiography: comparison of three-dimensional fast spin-echo and single- and multisection half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequences.

Authors:  J A Soto; M A Barish; O Alvarez; S Medina
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration.

Authors:  D R Urbach; Y S Khajanchee; B A Jobe; B A Standage; P D Hansen; L L Swanstrom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  M Rhodes; L Sussman; L Cohen; M P Lewis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-01-17       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Cholangiography during cholecystectomy: a plea for selective use.

Authors:  J N Ijzermans; P De Waard; J W Merkelbach
Journal:  Neth J Surg       Date:  1989-08

6.  Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects.

Authors:  A S Fulcher; M A Turner; G W Capps; A M Zfass; K M Baker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Migration of gall stones.

Authors:  T V Taylor; C P Armstrong
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-05-23

8.  Intraoperative cholangiography. A review of indications and analysis of age-sex groups.

Authors:  S B Levine; H J Lerner; E D Leifer; S R Lindheim
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy.

Authors:  A L DePaula; K Hashiba; M Bafutto; R Zago; M M Machado
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1993-06

10.  Common bile duct exploration in the era of laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  M E Stoker
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1995-03
View more
  10 in total

1.  Sphincter of oddi dysfunction: stones, spasm, or stenosis?

Authors:  Richard A Kozarek
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2007-09

2.  Prediction of which patients with an abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram will have a confirmed stone at ERCP.

Authors:  Matthew P Spinn; David S Wolf; Dharmendra Verma; Frank J Lukens
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Cost-effective treatment of patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and possible common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Lisa M Brown; Stanley J Rogers; John P Cello; Karen J Brasel; John M Inadomi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Evaluation of patients with abnormalities on intraoperative cholangiogram: time to abandon endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as the initial follow-up study.

Authors:  Jason G Bill; Vladimir M Kushnir; Daniel K Mullady; Faris M Murad; Riad R Azar; Jeffery J Easler; Dayna S Early; Steven A Edmundowicz
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-16

5.  Major biliary complications in 2,714 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative cholangiography: a multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Mostafa A Hamad; Ahmad A Nada; Mohamad Y Abdel-Atty; Ahmad S Kawashti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Triple non-invasive diagnostic test for exclusion of common bile ducts stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Bahram Pourseidi; Amir Khorram-Manesh
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  How reliable is intraoperative cholangiography as a method for detecting common bile duct stones? : A prospective population-based study on 1171 patients.

Authors:  Per Videhult; Gabriel Sandblom; Ib Christian Rasmussen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Identifying patients most likely to have a common bile duct stone after a positive intraoperative cholangiogram.

Authors:  Raja Vadlamudi; Jason Conway; Girish Mishra; John Baillie; John Gilliam; Adolfo Fernandez; John Evans
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2014-04

9.  The Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Approach without the Intraopertative Cholangiography Use: A Retrospective Study on 750 Consecutive Patients.

Authors:  Kemal Atahan; Serhat Gur; Evren Durak; Atilla Cokmez; Ercument Tarcan
Journal:  Gastroenterology Res       Date:  2012-07-20

10.  Role of intraoperative cholangiography for detecting residual stones after biliary pancreatitis: still useful? A retrospective study.

Authors:  Abdelrahman Abdelaal; Moamena El-Matbouly; Ibnouf Sulieman; Ahmad Elfaki; Tamer El-Bakary; Sherif Abdelaziem; Salahdin Gehani; Adriana Toro; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 5.469

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.