Literature DB >> 24976807

Identifying patients most likely to have a common bile duct stone after a positive intraoperative cholangiogram.

Raja Vadlamudi1, Jason Conway1, Girish Mishra1, John Baillie1, John Gilliam1, Adolfo Fernandez1, John Evans1.   

Abstract

The false-positive rates of a positive intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) are as high as 60%. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for stone removal is required after a positive IOC. It is unclear which clinical factors identify patients most likely to have a stone after a positive IOC. This study was conducted to identify factors predictive of common bile duct (CBD) stone(s) on ERCP after a positive IOC. A retrospective review of our endoscopic database identified all ERCP and/or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) procedures performed for a positive IOC between August 2003 and August 2009. Collected data included patient demographics; indication for cholecystectomy; IOC findings; blood tests before and after cholecystectomy, including liver function tests, complete blood count, and amylase and lipase measurements; and ERCP and/or EUS results. Patients who had a negative EUS for CBD stones and no subsequent ERCP were contacted by phone to see if they eventually required an ERCP. Univariate and multi-variable analyses were performed. A total of 114 patients were included in the study. IOC findings included a single stone, multiple stones, nonpassage of contrast into the duodenum, dilated CBD, and poor visualization of the bile duct. Eighty-four percent of patients had ERCP only, 9% had EUS only, and 7% had EUS followed by ERCP. Sixty-five patients (57%) had CBD stones on ERCP or EUS. Older age, multiple stones, dilated CBD on IOC, and elevated postcholecystectomy bilirubin levels were the clinical variables with statistically significant differences on univariate analysis. On multivariable analysis, older age and elevated postcholecystectomy total bilirubin levels correlated with the presence of CBD stones on ERCP. Fifty-seven percent of patients referred for endoscopic evaluation after a positive IOC had CBD stones on ERCP. Patients with CBD stones after a positive IOC were more likely to be older with elevated post-cholecystectomy total serum bilirubin levels.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Common bile duct stone; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogra-phy; endoscopic ultrasound; intraoperative cholangiogram

Year:  2014        PMID: 24976807      PMCID: PMC4073535     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)        ISSN: 1554-7914


  22 in total

1.  Evaluation of the predictors of choledocholithiasis: comparative analysis of clinical, biochemical, radiological, radionuclear, and intraoperative parameters.

Authors:  S M Bose; A Mazumdar; V S Prakash; R Kocher; S Katariya; C M Pathak
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Detection of choledocholithiasis with MR cholangiography: comparison of three-dimensional fast spin-echo and single- and multisection half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequences.

Authors:  J A Soto; M A Barish; O Alvarez; S Medina
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Systematic review of intraoperative cholangiography in cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J A Ford; M Soop; J Du; B P T Loveday; M Rodgers
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Do all patients with abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram merit endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?

Authors:  S Varadarajulu; M A Eloubeidi; C M Wilcox; R H Hawes; P B Cotton
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary obstruction.

Authors:  Donald Garrow; Scott Miller; Debajyoti Sinha; Jason Conway; Brenda J Hoffman; Robert H Hawes; Joseph Romagnuolo
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  Prediction of which patients with an abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram will have a confirmed stone at ERCP.

Authors:  Matthew P Spinn; David S Wolf; Dharmendra Verma; Frank J Lukens
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  A survey of the accuracy of interpretation of intraoperative cholangiograms.

Authors:  Pandanaboyana Sanjay; Sherry Tagolao; Ilse Dirkzwager; Adam Bartlett
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Imaging of the common bile duct in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P J Hainsworth; M Rhodes; R H Gompertz; C P Armstrong; T W Lennard
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects.

Authors:  A S Fulcher; M A Turner; G W Capps; A M Zfass; K M Baker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Intraoperative cholangiography. A review of indications and analysis of age-sex groups.

Authors:  S B Levine; H J Lerner; E D Leifer; S R Lindheim
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Review of current and evolving clinical indications for endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Anjuli K Luthra; John A Evans
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-02-10

Review 2.  Diagnostic and Therapeutic Indications for Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) in Patients with Pancreatic and Biliary Disease-Novel Interventional Procedures.

Authors:  Manfred Prager; Elfi Prager; Christian Sebesta; Christian Sebesta
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.109

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.