Literature DB >> 18398646

How reliable is intraoperative cholangiography as a method for detecting common bile duct stones? : A prospective population-based study on 1171 patients.

Per Videhult1, Gabriel Sandblom, Ib Christian Rasmussen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) is a widely used method for detecting common bile duct stones (CBDS), its accuracy has not been fully evaluated in large nonselected patient samples. The purpose of this study was to assess the sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of dynamic IOC regarding its ability to diagnose CBDS in a population-based setting, and to assess the morbidity associated with the investigation.
METHODS: All patients operated on for gallstone disease between 2003 and 2005 in the county of Uppsala in Sweden, a county with a population of 302,000 in December 2004, were registered prospectively. The outcome of cholangiography was validated against the postoperative clinical course.
RESULTS: 1171 patients were registered, and among these IOC was performed in 1117 patients (95%). Common bile duct stones were found in 134 patients (11%). One perforation of the common bile duct caused by the IOC catheter was recorded. Sensitivity was 97%, specificity 99%, negative predictive value 99%, positive predictive value 95%, and overall accuracy 99%. In 7 of the 134 cases where IOC indicated CBDS, no stones could be verified on exploration. In 4 of the 979 cases where IOC was normal, the clinical course indicated overlooked CBDS.
CONCLUSION: Intraoperative cholangiography is a safe and accurate method for detecting common bile duct stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18398646     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-9883-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  10 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic ultrasonography versus operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: review of the literature and a comparison with open intraoperative ultrasonography.

Authors:  J Machi; T Tateishi; A J Oishi; N L Furumoto; R H Oishi; S Uchida; B Sigel
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 2.  Is laparoscopic intraoperative cholangiogram a matter of routine?

Authors:  Matthew S Metcalfe; Thao Ong; Martin H Bruening; Harish Iswariah; Simon A Wemyss-Holden; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Do all patients with abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram merit endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?

Authors:  S Varadarajulu; M A Eloubeidi; C M Wilcox; R H Hawes; P B Cotton
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Intraoperative cholangiography: past, present, and future.

Authors:  B V MacFadyen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A comparison of intraoperative ultrasound versus cholangiography in the evaluation of the common bile duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J A Barteau; D Castro; M E Arregui; C Tetik
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comparison of laparoscopic ultrasonography and fluorocholangiography in 300 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Siperstein; J Pearl; J Macho; P Hansen; A Gitomirsky; S Rogers
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic ultrasonography using a flexible-tip ultrasound probe and intraoperative dynamic cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M Birth; K U Ehlers; K Delinikolas; H F Weiser
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Intraoperative three-dimensional fluoroscopic cholangiography.

Authors:  Guido Beldi; Martin Styner; Sebastian Schindera; Daniel Inderbitzin; Daniel Candinas
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr

9.  Evaluation of operative cholangiography in 2043 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case for the selective operative cholangiogram.

Authors:  L L Snow; L S Weinstein; J K Hannon; D R Lane
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  A comparison of laparoscopic ultrasound with digital fluorocholangiography for detecting choledocholithiasis during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D M Thompson; M E Arregui; C Tetik; M T Madden; M Wegener
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.584

  10 in total
  19 in total

1.  Comparison of one stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intra-operative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus two-stage pre-operative endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of pre-operatively diagnosed patients with common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chester Tan; Omar Ocampo; Raymund Ong; Kim Shi Tan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  SAGES clinical spotlight review: intraoperative cholangiography.

Authors:  William W Hope; Robert Fanelli; Danielle S Walsh; Vimal K Narula; Ray Price; Dimitrios Stefanidis; William S Richardson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Laparoendoscopic rendezvous reduces perioperative morbidity and risk of pancreatitis.

Authors:  Alberto Arezzo; Nereo Vettoretto; Federico Famiglietti; Lorenzo Moja; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  MRCP is not a cost-effective strategy in the management of silent common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Irene Epelboym; Megan Winner; John D Allendorf
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Low ninety-day re-admission rates after emergency and elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a district general hospital.

Authors:  Sue K Down; Marko Nicolic; Hibba Abdulkarim; Nick Skelton; Adrian H Harris; Yashwant Koak
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Cost-effective treatment of patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and possible common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Lisa M Brown; Stanley J Rogers; John P Cello; Karen J Brasel; John M Inadomi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Are liver function tests, pancreatitis and cholecystitis predictors of common bile duct stones? Results of a prospective, population-based, cohort study of 1171 patients undergoing cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Per Videhult; Gabriel Sandblom; Claes Rudberg; Ib Christian Rasmussen
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Practice Patterns for Cholecystectomy After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Patients With Choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Robert J Huang; Monique T Barakat; Mohit Girotra; Subhas Banerjee
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 9.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus intraoperative cholangiography for diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Vanja Giljaca; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

10.  Scoring System for the Management of Acute Gallstone Pancreatitis: Cost Analysis of a Prospective Study.

Authors:  Jake G Prigoff; Gary W Swain; Celia M Divino
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.