Literature DB >> 6639173

Intraoperative cholangiography. A review of indications and analysis of age-sex groups.

S B Levine, H J Lerner, E D Leifer, S R Lindheim.   

Abstract

A retrospective review was performed of patients who had biliary tract stone formation as the primary diagnosis for hospitalization and indication for surgery. Five hundred and eighty-nine consecutive charts were reviewed of patients admitted between 1975 and 1979. Intraoperative cholangiography was performed in 166 patients of whom 22 had common duct exploration. Choledochotomy in this series was performed in 63 cases without utilizing pre-exploratory cholangiography. A normal intraoperative cholangiogram was found to be 100% accurate; however, an abnormal cholangiogram was associated with a 16% false positive rate of exploration of the common duct. The incidence of unsuspected common duct stones detected only by intraoperative cholangiography was 2.3%. Age-sex analysis confirms a 10-year mean age difference between men and women within the population of this study (p less than 0.001). This age-sex difference is maintained in patients without common duct pathology as well as in patients with sterile bile. However, the mean age difference between male and female patients with either demonstrable common duct obstruction by stones or infected bile as determined by routine intraoperative culture is not statistically significant. A review of the role of intraoperative cholangiography, and the experience at Northeastern Hospital is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6639173      PMCID: PMC1353215          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198312000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  44 in total

1.  Technique and evaluation of operative cholangiography.

Authors:  J P ISAACS; M L DAVES
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1960-07

2.  Operative cholangiography; the case for its broadened use in biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  J H Isch
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1973-07

3.  Routine operative cholangiogram.

Authors:  F W Taylor
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1973-06

4.  Management of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  L W Way; W H Admirand; J E Dunphy
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Cholecystitis in adolescents.

Authors:  R W Crichlow; M H Seltzer; P J Jannetta
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1972-01

6.  The diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  J L Mullen; F E Rosato; E F Rosato; W T Miller; M Sullivan
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1971-11

7.  28,621 cholecystectomies in Ohio. Results of a survey in Ohio hospitals by the Gallbladder Survey Committee, Ohio Chapter, American College of Surgeons.

Authors:  D J Arnold
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Operative cholangiography.

Authors:  J M Acosta; W T Fotheringham; L O Ruiz; G L Nardi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1969-07

9.  Routine operative cholangiography.

Authors:  K L Allen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Choledochotomy in nonmalignant disease of the biliary tract.

Authors:  F Glenn
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1967-05
View more
  13 in total

1.  Selective cholangiography. Current role in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; C J Yeo; M A Talamini; B H Wang; H A Pitt; T R Gadacz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Do all patients with abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram merit endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?

Authors:  S Varadarajulu; M A Eloubeidi; C M Wilcox; R H Hawes; P B Cotton
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Prediction of which patients with an abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram will have a confirmed stone at ERCP.

Authors:  Matthew P Spinn; David S Wolf; Dharmendra Verma; Frank J Lukens
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Consequences of routine peroperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy for gallstone disease: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  M Hauer-Jensen; R Kåresen; K Nygaard; K Solheim; E Amlie; O Havig; K O Viddal
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Routine laparoscopic ultrasonography in biliary surgery. A preliminary experience.

Authors:  R Orda; J Sayfan; Y Levy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Current dilemmas in management of common duct stones.

Authors:  A S Fink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic management of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  A L DePaula; K Hashiba; M Bafutto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Predictive ability of choledocholithiasis indicators. A prospective evaluation.

Authors:  M Hauer-Jensen; R Kåresen; K Nygaard; K Solheim; E Amlie; O Havig; K O Viddal
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Mirizzi syndrome: history, current knowledge and proposal of a simplified classification.

Authors:  Marcelo A Beltrán
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Identifying patients most likely to have a common bile duct stone after a positive intraoperative cholangiogram.

Authors:  Raja Vadlamudi; Jason Conway; Girish Mishra; John Baillie; John Gilliam; Adolfo Fernandez; John Evans
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2014-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.