Literature DB >> 28839843

Evaluation of patients with abnormalities on intraoperative cholangiogram: time to abandon endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as the initial follow-up study.

Jason G Bill1, Vladimir M Kushnir1, Daniel K Mullady1, Faris M Murad1, Riad R Azar1, Jeffery J Easler1, Dayna S Early1, Steven A Edmundowicz1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is currently the method of choice for the postoperative evaluation of suspected bile duct stones seen on intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC); however, the sensitivity of IOC for identifying biliary pathology is unclear, with studies reporting false positive rates between 30% and 60%.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the sensitivity of IOC for biliary pathology, using ERCP with sphincterotomy and balloon sweep as gold standard.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Tertiary medical centre. PATIENTS: 130 consecutive patients (age 51.3±1.7 years, 69.2% women) who underwent ERCP for the evaluation of abnormalities identified on IOC between 2005 and 2013.
INTERVENTIONS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Sensitivity of IOC, identify predictors of positive postoperative ERCP and ERCP-related complications.
RESULTS: ERCP was successful in all 130 subjects. ERCP-related adverse events occurred in six (4.3%) patients, including self-limited post-sphincterotomy bleeding in three (2.3%) and mild post-ERCP pancreatitis in three (2.3%). Overall, 41 (31.5%) patients had normal cholangiogram at time of ERCP. Finding of a filling defect on IOC was the only predictor for the presence of common bile duct stones on postoperative ERCP (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.0 to 10.8, p=0.05). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study design.
CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one-third of patients with abnormal IOC had a normal postoperative ERCP. Significant pathology could have been missed in 1/130 patients. Based on these findings, we believe the use of less-invasive diagnostic modalities may be used in place of ERCP in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis on IOC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BILIARY ENDOSCOPY; BILIARY OBSTRUCTION; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPY; GALLBLADDER

Year:  2015        PMID: 28839843      PMCID: PMC5369474          DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2015-100597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2041-4137


  21 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of intraoperative cholangiography in cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J A Ford; M Soop; J Du; B P T Loveday; M Rodgers
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Do all patients with abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram merit endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?

Authors:  S Varadarajulu; M A Eloubeidi; C M Wilcox; R H Hawes; P B Cotton
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Prediction of which patients with an abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram will have a confirmed stone at ERCP.

Authors:  Matthew P Spinn; David S Wolf; Dharmendra Verma; Frank J Lukens
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Management of choledocholithiasis in the era of laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  A Hawasli; L Lloyd; B Cacucci
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  Do preoperative indicators predict the presence of common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Authors:  K P Koo; L W Traverso
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Complications of cholecystectomy: risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography: a population-based study.

Authors:  D R Fletcher; M S Hobbs; P Tan; L J Valinsky; R L Hockey; T J Pikora; M W Knuiman; H J Sheiner; A Edis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Predictive ability of choledocholithiasis indicators. A prospective evaluation.

Authors:  M Hauer-Jensen; R Kåresen; K Nygaard; K Solheim; E Amlie; O Havig; K O Viddal
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Is routine intraoperative cholangiogram necessary in the twenty-first century? A national view.

Authors:  Elizaveta Ragulin-Coyne; Elan R Witkowski; Zeling Chau; Sing Chau Ng; Heena P Santry; Mark P Callery; Shimul A Shah; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Prediction of common bile duct stones by noninvasive tests.

Authors:  F Prat; B Meduri; B Ducot; R Chiche; R Salimbeni-Bartolini; G Pelletier
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects.

Authors:  A S Fulcher; M A Turner; G W Capps; A M Zfass; K M Baker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.