Literature DB >> 10831692

Detection of choledocholithiasis with MR cholangiography: comparison of three-dimensional fast spin-echo and single- and multisection half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequences.

J A Soto1, M A Barish, O Alvarez, S Medina.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the performance of three pulse sequences commonly used at magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR cholangiography was performed in 57 patients who were suspected of having choledocholithiasis and referred for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Non-breath-hold three-dimensional fast spin-echo, breath-hold single-section half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE), and breath-hold multisection half-Fourier RARE sequences were compared. Two radiologists independently interpreted the MR cholangiograms. Evaluated diagnostic performance parameters included sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and interobserver agreement (kappa statistics). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was the standard of reference.
RESULTS: Eight patients were excluded because of incomplete MR examinations (n = 4) or failure in the cannulation of the bile duct at retrograde cholangiography (n = 4). In 49 patients, the three MR cholangiographic sequences were completed successfully. In 24 (49%) of these patients, retrograde cholangiography demonstrated stones. Sensitivity and specificity of MR cholangiography exceeded 90%, and the area under the ROC curve was greater than 0.95 for both radiologists and for the three sequences. Interobserver agreement for presence of bile duct stones was at least 0.80 (very good) for the three sequences.
CONCLUSION: The three MR cholangiographic sequences had similarly high sensitivities and specificities for the detection of choledocholithiasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10831692     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00ma12737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  15 in total

1.  Choledocholithiasis: repetitive thick-slab single-shot projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography versus endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  S Schmidt; P Chevallier; S Novellas; E Gelsi; G Vanbiervliet; A Tran; P Schnyder; J N Bruneton
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  [Value of radiological methods in the diagnosis of biliary diseases].

Authors:  J E W Zajaczek; M Keberle
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  [Comparison of 2D and 3D sequences for MRCP. Clinical value of the different techniques].

Authors:  A M Wallnoefer; K A Herrmann; U Beuers; C J Zech; S Gourtsoyianni; M F Reiser; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Do all patients with abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram merit endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?

Authors:  S Varadarajulu; M A Eloubeidi; C M Wilcox; R H Hawes; P B Cotton
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Prediction of which patients with an abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram will have a confirmed stone at ERCP.

Authors:  Matthew P Spinn; David S Wolf; Dharmendra Verma; Frank J Lukens
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Common bile duct stones - their presentation, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Rajendra Desai; Bahaman N Shokouhi
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 0.656

7.  Preoperative evaluation of the cystic duct for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of navigator-gated prospective acquisition correction- and conventional respiratory-triggered techniques at free-breathing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Ryo Itatani; Tomohiro Namimoto; Hiroo Kajihara; Akira Yoshimura; Kazuhiro Katahira; Jiro Nasu; Ikuo Matsushita; Fumi Sakamoto; Masafumi Kidoh; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison of two- and three-dimensional sequences for assessment of malignant biliary obstruction.

Authors:  Jin-Young Choi; Myeong-Jin Kim; Jeong Min Lee; Jae Young Lee; Se Hyung Kim; Ki Whang Kim; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Diagnosis and management of acute cholangitis.

Authors:  John G Lee
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 46.802

10.  Identifying patients most likely to have a common bile duct stone after a positive intraoperative cholangiogram.

Authors:  Raja Vadlamudi; Jason Conway; Girish Mishra; John Baillie; John Gilliam; Adolfo Fernandez; John Evans
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2014-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.