Literature DB >> 16520991

[Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements in the course of product certification according to EN ISO 8612:2001].

E M Hoffmann1, N Pfeiffer, L Barleon, F H Grus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements between Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) during product certification according to the international requirements for ophthalmic instruments (tonometers, ISO 8612:2001).
METHODS: The study included 160 eyes of 80 subjects. IOP measurements were performed four times consecutively on each instrument in randomized order. The difference of mean IOP measurements between GAT and DCT was analyzed. Furthermore, Bland and Altman analysis was performed to assess agreement between the instruments.
RESULTS: The mean difference between DCT and GAT IOP measurements was 0.30+/-2.18 mmHg. At low to normal IOP values of 7-16 mmHg and higher IOP values of > or =23 mmHg, the difference between DCT IOP measurements and GAT IOP measurements increased in the opposite direction (1.44+/-1.59 mmHg and -1.47+/-2.57 mmHg). The Bland and Altman analysis revealed a fixed bias of -0.4+/-2.0 mmHg.
CONCLUSIONS: The test tonometer DCT exceeds the requirements for the international standard for tonometers ISO 8612:2001. The results are valid for a central corneal thickness of 540+/-40 microm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16520991     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-006-1318-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  10 in total

Review 1.  Statistical techniques for comparing measurers and methods of measurement: a critical review.

Authors:  John Ludbrook
Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.557

2.  Deviations between transpalpebral tonometry using TGDc-01 and Goldmann applanation tonometry depending on the IOP level.

Authors:  Annette Troost; Kathrin Specht; Frank Krummenauer; Sung Hyun Yun; Oliver Schwenn
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Comparison of the Tono-Pen and Goldmann tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  Gregory S Horowitz; Julie Byles; John Lee; Catherine D'Este
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Intraocular pressure and systemic blood pressure: longitudinal perspective: the Beaver Dam Eye Study.

Authors:  B E K Klein; R Klein; M D Knudtson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non-contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Authors:  P-A Tonnu; T Ho; T Newson; A El Sheikh; K Sharma; E White; C Bunce; D Garway-Heath
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Changes in corneal thickness and curvature after different excimer laser photorefractive procedures and their impact on intraocular pressure measurements.

Authors:  Helena Svedberg; Enping Chen; Helene Hamberg-Nyström
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Transpalpebral tonometry: reliability and comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry and palpation in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  A Troost; S H Yun; K Specht; F Krummenauer; O Schwenn
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Clinical evaluation of the pressure phosphene tonometer in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  E Rietveld; D A van den Bremer; H J Völker-Dieben
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Measurement of intraocular pressure using the NT-4000: a new non-contact tonometer equipped with pulse synchronous measurement function.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Yaoeda; Motohiro Shirakashi; Atsushi Fukushima; Shigeo Funaki; Haruko Funaki; Nobutaka Ofuchi; Tomoko Nakatsue; Haruki Abe
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.503

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  [Effect of applanation tonometry on precision of biometry measurements].

Authors:  T M Rabsilber; S Bueltmann; M P Holzer; G U Auffarth
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  [Dynamic contour tonometry].

Authors:  C Kniestedt; H E Kanngiesser
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  [Measuring intraocular pressure by different methods].

Authors:  J Lamparter; E M Hoffmann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  [A comparison of rebound tonometry (ICare) with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry].

Authors:  W Schreiber; C K Vorwerk; A Langenbucher; W Behrens-Baumann; A Viestenz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.059

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.