Literature DB >> 16511674

Optimization of dose and image quality for computed radiography and digital radiography.

John E Aldrich1, Emerenciana Duran, Pat Dunlop, John R Mayo.   

Abstract

The surface doses to patients during chest, abdomen and pelvis radiography were measured over a period of 3 years, during which time computed radiography (CR) and digital radiography (DR) systems were introduced to replace film-screen systems. For film-screen and CR the surface doses were measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters. For DR the surface doses were calculated from the dose-area product (DAP) meter readings. Measurements were made for each type of examination and detector type on 10 average-size patients. Measurements were made immediately after the new systems were introduced, and subsequently as adjustments were made to optimize dose and image quality. Published diagnostic reference levels were used as target values in this optimization. Initially, CR doses were the same as or higher than for film-screen, and the doses were lower for DR compared to film-screen. Subsequent clinical experience with the systems led to changes in the technique used for chest examinations both for CR and for DR. For CR, it was possible to change the algorithm and decrease the dose to one quarter of the initial value with acceptable image quality. For DR, it was decided to reduce noise by increasing the dose by a factor of two. No changes were made to abdomen or pelvic imaging techniques for either CR or DR. The final patient surface doses using CR were similar to published diagnostic reference doses; for DR, all patient doses were less than published reference levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16511674      PMCID: PMC3045190          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-006-9944-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  5 in total

1.  Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging: review and additional advice.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2001

2.  Reference values for diagnostic radiology: application and impact.

Authors:  Joel E Gray; Benjamin R Archer; Priscilla F Butler; Barry B Hobbs; Fred A Mettler; Robert J Pizzutiello; Beth A Schueler; Keith J Strauss; Orhan H Suleiman; Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Patient dosimetry activities in the United States: the nationwide evaluation of X-ray trends (NEXT) and tissue dose handbooks.

Authors:  O H Suleiman; S H Stern; D C Spelic
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Measurement of x-ray exposures using mailed thermoluminescent dosimeters.

Authors:  J E Aldrich; J W Andrew
Journal:  J Can Assoc Radiol       Date:  1981-12

5.  Beam quality independent attenuation phantom for estimating patient exposure from x-ray automatic exposure controlled chest examinations.

Authors:  B J Conway; P F Butler; J E Duff; T R Fewell; R E Gross; R J Jennings; G H Koustenis; J L McCrohan; F G Rueter; C K Showalter
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1984 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

  5 in total
  11 in total

1.  Letter to the editor re: "Optimizing the use of computer radiography in pediatric chest imaging".

Authors:  Charles E Willis
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Assessment of patient doses in CR examinations throughout a large health region.

Authors:  Yogesh Thakur; Thorarin A Bjarnason; Kevin Hammerstrom; Lorie Marchinkow; Tim Koch; John E Aldrich
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Optimization of the radiological protection of patients undergoing digital radiography.

Authors:  Menglong Zhang; Cunkun Chu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Optimisation of radiological protocols for chest imaging using computed radiography and flat-panel X-ray detectors.

Authors:  G Compagnone; M Casadio Baleni; E Di Nicola; M Valentino; M Benati; L F Calzolaio; N Oberhofer; E Fabbri; S Domenichelli; L Barozzi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Dose audit for patients undergoing two common radiography examinations with digital radiology systems.

Authors:  Tolga İnal; Gökçe Ataç
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

6.  Patient dose evaluation by means of DICOM images for a direct radiography system.

Authors:  O Rampado; E Garelli; R Zatteri; U Escoffier; R De Lucchi; R Ropolo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  A Comparison of the effectiveness of Mammographic Film-Screen and Standard Film-Screen in the Detection of Small Bone Fractures.

Authors:  Karim Ghazikhanlou Sani; Mahmoodreza Jafari; Nima Rostampoor
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2011-12

8.  Assessment of patient dose and optimization levels in chest and abdomen CR examinations at referral hospitals in Tanzania.

Authors:  A O Masoud; W E Muhogora; P K Msaki
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Variation of Pediatric Doses Undergoing Digital and Computed Radiography Examination in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Seife Teferi; Daniel Zewdeneh
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2020-03

10.  Radiation dose to patients from X-ray radiographic examinations using computed radiography imaging system.

Authors:  Reena Sharma; Sunil Dutt Sharma; Shramika Pawar; Ajay Chaubey; S Kantharia; D A R Babu
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.