Literature DB >> 19051055

Radiation reduction with prospective ECG-triggering acquisition using 64-multidetector Computed Tomographic angiography.

Ambarish Gopal1, Song S Mao, Daniel Karlsberg, Emily Young, Joshua Waggoner, Naser Ahmadi, Raveen S Pal, John Leal, Ronald P Karlsberg, Matthew J Budoff.   

Abstract

Current 64-multidetector Computed Tomographic scanners (MDCT) utilize retrospective overlapping helical acquisition (RS-OHA) which imparts a higher than desired radiation dose. Although the radiation burden of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) can be efficiently reduced by dose modulation and limiting field of view, a further decrease in radiation without compromising diagnostic image quality would be indeed very desirable. An alternative imaging mode is the axial prospective ECG-triggering acquisition (prospective gating). This study was done to compare the effective radiation dose and the image quality with two techniques to reduce radiation doses with CTA studies utilizing 64-MDCT scanners. The study included 149 consecutive patients (48 females and 101 males) 64-MDCT (mean age = 67 +/- 11 years, 72.2% male). Patients underwent CT coronary angiography using one of three algorithms: retrospective triggering with dose modulation; prospective triggering with padding (step and shoot acquisition with additional adjacent phases); and prospective triggering without padding (single phase acquisition only). Based on body habitus, two different voltages were utilized: 100 kVp (<85 kg) or 120 kVp (>85 kg). Radiation doses and image quality (signal to noise ratio) was measured for each patient, and compared between different acquisition protocols. The signal to-noise ratio of the ascending aorta (SNR-AA) was calculated from the mean pixel values of the contrast-filled left ventricular chamber divided by the standard deviation of these pixel values. Use of 100 kVp reduced radiation dose 41.5% using prospective triggering and 39.6% using retrospective imaging as compared to 120 kVp (P < 0.001). Use of prospective imaging reduced radiation exposure by 82.6% as compared to retrospective imaging (P < 0.001). Using both prospective imaging and 100 kVp without padding (single phase data, no other phases obtained), radiation dose was reduced by 90% (P < 0.001). In terms of image quality, the coefficient of variation of ascending aortic contrast enhancement between kVp of 120 and kVp of 100 was 6% (1.05, 95 CI 0.93-1.17), and 7.8% (0.9, 95% CI 0.7-1.2) at the pulmonary artery. The prospective ECG-Triggered acquisition and 100 kVp images were of diagnostic quality, allowing adequate assessment in all patients. CTA using PA and 100 kVp reduced the radiation dose by up to 90% without compromising the image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19051055     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-008-9396-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  33 in total

Review 1.  Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart.

Authors:  Richard L Morin; Thomas C Gerber; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Clinical utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance techniques for noninvasive coronary angiography.

Authors:  Matthew J Budoff; Stephan Achenbach; Andre Duerinckx
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-12-03       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Non-invasive coronary angiography using multislice computed tomography.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Schussler; Paul A Grayburn
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Low tube voltage improves computed tomography imaging of delayed myocardial contrast enhancement in an experimental acute myocardial infarction model.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken; Philipp Bruners; Georg Mühlenbruch; Melanie Emmerich; Christian Hohl; Rolf W Günther; Joachim E Wildberger
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose.

Authors:  James P Earls; Elise L Berman; Bruce A Urban; Charlene A Curry; Judith L Lane; Robert S Jennings; Colin C McCulloch; Jiang Hsieh; John H Londt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Current status and future directions in technical developments of cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Mannudeep K Kalra; Thomas J Brady
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2008-02-20

Review 7.  Cardiac computed tomography: diagnostic utility and integration in clinical practice.

Authors:  Matthew J Budoff; Ambarish Gopal; Deepika Gopalakrishnan
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.882

8.  Patient dose in cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.443

9.  Dose reduction in multidetector CT using attenuation-based online tube current modulation.

Authors:  Denis Tack; Viviane De Maertelaer; Pierre Alain Gevenois
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates.

Authors:  Jörg Hausleiter; Tanja Meyer; Martin Hadamitzky; Ester Huber; Maria Zankl; Stefan Martinoff; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  22 in total

1.  Evidence for prospective ECG-triggering coronary CT angiography in routine practice.

Authors:  Ali Salavati; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Quantification of radiation dose savings in cardiac computed tomography using prospectively triggered mode and ECG pulsing: a phantom study.

Authors:  Lukas Lehmkuhl; Dieter Gosch; H D Nagel; Patrick Stumpp; Thomas Kahn; Matthias Gutberlet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Reducing both radiation and contrast doses in coronary CT angiography in lean patients on a 16-cm wide-detector CT using 70 kVp and ASiR-V algorithm, in comparison with the conventional 100-kVp protocol.

Authors:  Yuhuan Chen; Zhentang Liu; Michelle Li; Yong Yu; Yongjun Jia; Guangming Ma; Zhijun Hu; DongHong Wei; Dou Li; Taiping He
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Absorbed radiation dose in radiosensitive organs during coronary CT angiography using 320-MDCT: effect of maximum tube voltage and heart rate variations.

Authors:  Boris Nikolic; Faisal Khosa; Pei-Jan Paul Lin; Atif N Khan; Sheryar Sarwar; Chun-Shan Yam; Laurence E Court; Vassilios Raptopoulos; Melvin E Clouse
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Focus on radiation exposure from cardiovascular imaging with computed tomography.

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Hans Reiber
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Radiation burden in myocardial imaging: an old concern in the new age of hi-tech, hybrid imaging.

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Prospective helical acquisition for coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Marc Dewey
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Established and emerging dose reduction methods in cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Gary R Small; Mustapha Kazmi; Robert A Dekemp; Benjamin J W Chow
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Declining radiation dose of coronary computed tomography angiography: German cardiac CT registry experience 2009-2014.

Authors:  Axel Schmermund; Mohamed Marwan; Jörg Hausleiter; Sebastian Barth; Oliver Bruder; Sebastian Kerber; Grigorius Korosoglou; Alexander Leber; Werner Moshage; Stephen Schröder; Steffen Schneider; Jochen Senges; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 5.460

10.  Low-dose CT angiography: sufficient contrast for vessel imaging?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J D Schuijf; J J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.