Literature DB >> 16497351

Searching for camouflaged targets: effects of target-background similarity on visual search.

Mark B Neider1, Gregory J Zelinsky.   

Abstract

Do observers search for camouflaged targets by looking through the distractors or by scrutinizing the target-similar background? In four experiments observers searched for toy targets among distractors under varying set size and target-background similarity (TBS) conditions. Manual errors and RTs increased with TBS, although search slopes did not significantly differ. Eye movement analyses revealed that the majority of fixations fell on discrete distractors rather than on the target-similar background, even under high TBS conditions. These data suggest a biased search process; salient patterns segmented from a background are preferred while more target-similar unsegmented regions of the background are relatively neglected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16497351     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  18 in total

1.  Search performance with discrete-cell stimulus arrays: filtered naturalistic images and probabilistic markers.

Authors:  Alan R Pinkus; Miriam J Poteet; Allan J Pantle
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-04-03

2.  Memory for the search path: evidence for a high-capacity representation of search history.

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  A theory of eye movements during target acquisition.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  The effect of expert knowledge on medical search: medical experts have specialized abilities for detecting serious lesions.

Authors:  Ryoichi Nakashima; Chisaki Watanabe; Eriko Maeda; Takeharu Yoshikawa; Izuru Matsuda; Soichiro Miki; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-10-01

5.  Fixating picture boundaries does not eliminate boundary extension: implications for scene representation.

Authors:  Kristin Michod Gagnier; Christopher A Dickinson; Helene Intraub
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Effects of part-based similarity on visual search: the Frankenbear experiment.

Authors:  Robert G Alexander; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-01-02       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Angular declination and the dynamic perception of egocentric distance.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; John W Philbeck; Philip W Wirtz; David Chichka
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Using multidimensional scaling to quantify similarity in visual search and beyond.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Hayward J Godwin; Gemma Fitzsimmons; Arryn Robbins; Tamaryn Menneer; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Target templates: the precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Idiosyncratic Patterns of Representational Similarity in Prefrontal Cortex Predict Attentional Performance.

Authors:  Jeongmi Lee; Joy J Geng
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.