Literature DB >> 22476358

Search performance with discrete-cell stimulus arrays: filtered naturalistic images and probabilistic markers.

Alan R Pinkus1, Miriam J Poteet, Allan J Pantle.   

Abstract

In order to partially fill the gap between search studies with artificial and naturalistic stimuli, experiments with segmented and spatially filtered images of real stimuli in the discrete cells of search arrays were conducted. RT × set size functions obtained with the spatially filtered arrays were compared with those obtained with geometric and other types of arrays. With the aid of Fourier analysis, components of target certainty/uncertainty, target-distractor similarity/dissimilarity, and distractor homogeneity/heterogeneity were evaluated for their effects on search performance and efficiency. The comparative effects of valid/invalid and ambiguous/unambiguous markers of search items were included in the experiments to probe the potential contributions of top-down and bottom-up control to search with naturalistic stimuli. Visual coding in the form of spatial frequency passbands and top-down preferences for distractor search were used to explain the results.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22476358     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-012-0434-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  37 in total

1.  Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

2.  Setting up the target template in visual search.

Authors:  Timothy J Vickery; Li-Wei King; Yuhong Jiang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Top-down attention selection is fine grained.

Authors:  Vidhya Navalpakkam; Laurent Itti
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Task-demands can immediately reverse the effects of sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli.

Authors:  Wolfgang Einhäuser; Ueli Rutishauser; Christof Koch
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  A scale invariant measure of clutter.

Authors:  Mary J Bravo; Hany Farid
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Top-down weighting of visual dimensions: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Michael Zehetleitner; Klaus Gramann; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: investigating a "dimension-weighting" account.

Authors:  A Found; H J Müller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-01

8.  How serial is serial processing in vision?

Authors:  E Zohary; S Hochstein
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Set-size effects in visual search: the effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks.

Authors:  J Palmer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Measuring visual clutter.

Authors:  Ruth Rosenholtz; Yuanzhen Li; Lisa Nakano
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.