Literature DB >> 25214306

Target templates: the precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search.

Michael C Hout1, Stephen D Goldinger.   

Abstract

When people look for things in the environment, they use target templates-mental representations of the objects they are attempting to locate-to guide attention and to assess incoming visual input as potential targets. However, unlike laboratory participants, searchers in the real world rarely have perfect knowledge regarding the potential appearance of targets. In seven experiments, we examined how the precision of target templates affects the ability to conduct visual search. Specifically, we degraded template precision in two ways: 1) by contaminating searchers' templates with inaccurate features, and 2) by introducing extraneous features to the template that were unhelpful. We recorded eye movements to allow inferences regarding the relative extents to which attentional guidance and decision-making are hindered by template imprecision. Our findings support a dual-function theory of the target template and highlight the importance of examining template precision in visual search.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25214306      PMCID: PMC4286498          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0764-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  92 in total

1.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement.

Authors:  J Duncan; G Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  A new look at novelty effects: guiding search away from old distractors.

Authors:  Hyejin Yang; Xin Chen; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The cost of search for multiple targets: effects of practice and target similarity.

Authors:  Tamaryn Menneer; Kyle R Cave; Nick Donnelly
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2009-06

4.  Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search.

Authors:  L Chelazzi; J Duncan; E K Miller; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Object decoding with attention in inferior temporal cortex.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Ethan M Meyers; Narcisse P Bichot; Thomas Serre; Tomaso A Poggio; Robert Desimone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  What top-down task sets do for us: an ERP study on the benefits of advance preparation in visual search.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; Monika Kiss; Susan Nicholas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Saccadic undershoot is not inevitable: saccades can be accurate.

Authors:  Z Kapoula; D A Robinson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry.

Authors:  C Koch; S Ullman
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1985

9.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Search Image Formation in the Blue Jay (Cyanocitta cristata).

Authors:  A T Pietrewicz; A C Kamil
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-06-22       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  30 in total

1.  Do we remember templates better so that we can reject distractors better?

Authors:  Jason Rajsic; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Faster than the speed of rejection: Object identification processes during visual search for multiple targets.

Authors:  Hayward J Godwin; Stephen C Walenchok; Joseph W Houpt; Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The confirmation and prevalence biases in visual search reflect separate underlying processes.

Authors:  Stephen C Walenchok; Stephen D Goldinger; Michael C Hout
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  Template-to-distractor distinctiveness regulates visual search efficiency.

Authors:  Joy J Geng; Phillip Witkowski
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-01-11

5.  The attentional template is shifted and asymmetrically sharpened by distractor context.

Authors:  Xinger Yu; Joy J Geng
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Comparing visual search and eye movements in bilinguals and monolinguals.

Authors:  Ileana Ratiu; Michael C Hout; Stephen C Walenchok; Tamiko Azuma; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The poverty of embodied cognition.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Megan H Papesh; Anthony S Barnhart; Whitney A Hansen; Michael C Hout
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

8.  Changes in visual cortical processing attenuate singleton distraction during visual search.

Authors:  Bo-Yeong Won; Martha Forloines; Zhiheng Zhou; Joy J Geng
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Failures of perception in the low-prevalence effect: Evidence from active and passive visual search.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen C Walenchok; Stephen D Goldinger; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 10.  Using multidimensional scaling to quantify similarity in visual search and beyond.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Hayward J Godwin; Gemma Fitzsimmons; Arryn Robbins; Tamaryn Menneer; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.