Literature DB >> 17482657

Memory for the search path: evidence for a high-capacity representation of search history.

Christopher A Dickinson1, Gregory J Zelinsky.   

Abstract

Using a gaze-contingent paradigm, we directly measured observers' memory capacity for fixated distractor locations during search. After approximately half of the search objects had been fixated, they were masked and a spatial probe appeared at either a previously fixated location or a non-fixated location; observers then rated their confidence that the target had appeared at the probed location. Observers were able to differentiate the 12 most recently fixated distractor locations from non-fixated locations, but analyses revealed that these locations were represented fairly coarsely. We conclude that there exists a high-capacity, but low-resolution, memory for a search path.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17482657      PMCID: PMC2129092          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  29 in total

1.  Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: inhibition of return.

Authors:  H J Müller; A von Mühlenen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  On the manifestations of memory in visual search.

Authors:  D I Shore; R M Klein
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2000

3.  Transitional information in spatial serial memory: path characteristics affect recall performance.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; Greg Elford; Murray Mayberry
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Marking rejected distractors: a gaze-contingent technique for measuring memory during search.

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

5.  Visual search is guided by prospective and retrospective memory.

Authors:  Mathew S Peterson; Melissa R Beck; Miroslava Vomela
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-01

6.  Just say no: how are visual searches terminated when there is no target present?

Authors:  M M Chun; J M Wolfe
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Adjustment of fixation duration in visual search.

Authors:  I T Hooge; C J Erkelens
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention.

Authors:  A Cohen; R Ivry
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting.

Authors:  G Tassinari; S Aglioti; L Chelazzi; C A Marzi; G Berlucchi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Eye scanning of multi-element displays: I. Scanpath planning.

Authors:  John M Findlay; Valerie Brown
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  A theory of eye movements during target acquisition.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Do object refixations during scene viewing indicate rehearsal in visual working memory?

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Lester C Loschky; Christopher A Dickinson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-05

3.  Refixation control in free viewing: a specialized mechanism divulged by eye-movement-related brain activity.

Authors:  Andrey R Nikolaev; Radha Nila Meghanathan; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Maintaining rejected distractors in working memory during visual search depends on search stimuli: Evidence from contralateral delay activity.

Authors:  Lauren H Williams; Trafton Drew
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Ketamine-Induced Alteration of Working Memory Utility during Oculomotor Foraging Task in Monkeys.

Authors:  Ryo Sawagashira; Masaki Tanaka
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-04-06

6.  Characteristics of expert search behavior in volumetric medical image interpretation.

Authors:  Lauren H Williams; Ann J Carrigan; Megan Mills; William F Auffermann; Anina N Rich; Trafton Drew
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-07-14

7.  Refixation patterns reveal memory-encoding strategies in free viewing.

Authors:  Radha Nila Meghanathan; Andrey R Nikolaev; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Human visual search follows a suboptimal Bayesian strategy revealed by a spatiotemporal computational model and experiment.

Authors:  Yunhui Zhou; Yuguo Yu
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-01-04

9.  Humans represent the precision and utility of information acquired across fixations.

Authors:  Emma E M Stewart; Casimir J H Ludwig; Alexander C Schütz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  New Evidence for Strategic Differences between Static and Dynamic Search Tasks: An Individual Observer Analysis of Eye Movements.

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.