Literature DB >> 16463200

The interobserver-validated relevance of intervertebral spacer materials in MRI artifacting.

T Ernstberger1, G Heidrich, T Bruening, S Krefft, G Buchhorn, H M Klinger.   

Abstract

Intervertebral spacers for anterior spine fusion are made of different materials, such as titanium, carbon or cobalt-chrome, which can affect the post-fusion MRI scans. Implant-related susceptibility artifacts can decrease the quality of MRI scans, thwarting proper evaluation. This cadaver study aimed to demonstrate the extent that implant-related MRI artifacting affects the post-fusion evaluation of intervertebral spacers. In a cadaveric porcine spine, we evaluated the post-implantation MRI scans of three intervertebral spacers that differed in shape, material, surface qualities and implantation technique. A spacer made of human cortical bone was used as a control. The median sagittal MRI slice was divided into 12 regions of interest (ROI). No significant differences were found on 15 different MRI sequences read independently by an interobserver-validated team of specialists (P>0.05). Artifact-affected image quality was rated on a score of 0-1-2. A maximum score of 24 points (100%) was possible. Turbo spin echo sequences produced the best scores for all spacers and the control. Only the control achieved a score of 100%. The carbon, titanium and cobalt-chrome spacers scored 83.3, 62.5 and 50%, respectively. Our scoring system allowed us to create an implant-related ranking of MRI scan quality in reference to the control that was independent of artifact dimensions. The carbon spacer had the lowest percentage of susceptibility artifacts. Even with turbo spin echo sequences, the susceptibility artifacts produced by the metallic spacers showed a high degree of variability. Despite optimum sequencing, implant design and material are relevant factors in MRI artifacting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16463200      PMCID: PMC2200688          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0064-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  20 in total

Review 1.  The postoperative spine.

Authors:  C B Henk; W Brodner; S Grampp; M Breitenseher; M Thurnher; G H Mostbeck; H Imhof
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-08

2.  [Artefacts and ferromagnetism dependent on different metal alloys in magnetic resonance imaging. An experimental study].

Authors:  M Thomsen; U Schneider; S J Breusch; J Hansmann; M Freund
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Review article: MRI of the postoperative lumbar spine.

Authors:  J W M Van Goethem; P M Parizel; J R Jinkins
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2002-08-10       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  A comparison of magnetic resonance and computed tomographic image quality after the implantation of tantalum and titanium spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  J C Wang; W D Yu; H S Sandhu; V Tam; R B Delamarter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Spine update lumbar interbody cages.

Authors:  B K Weiner; R D Fraser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  MR parameters for imaging titanium spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  J C Wang; H S Sandhu; W D Yu; J T Minchew; R B Delamarter
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1997-02

7.  [Artifacts in MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint caused by dental alloys: a phantom model study at T1.5].

Authors:  C Fellner; M Behr; F Fellner; P Held; G Handel; S Feuerbach
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1997-05

8.  Metallic artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of patients with spinal fusion. A comparison of implant materials and imaging sequences.

Authors:  A Rudisch; C Kremser; S Peer; A Kathrein; W Judmaier; H Daniaux
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  [Carbon fiber-reinforced plastics as implant materials].

Authors:  R Bader; E Steinhauser; H Rechl; W Siebels; W Mittelmeier; R Gradinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  A comparative study of MR imaging profile of titanium pedicle screws.

Authors:  A S Malik; O Boyko; N Aktar; W F Young
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.701

View more
  10 in total

1.  Quantification of massive allograft healing with dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI and cone beam-CT: a pilot study.

Authors:  Nicole Ehrhart; Susan Kraft; David Conover; Randy N Rosier; Edward M Schwarz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  3-dimensional printing for anterior cervical surgery: a review.

Authors:  Wen Jie Choy; William C H Parr; Kevin Phan; William R Walsh; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12

Review 3.  Research and development of metals for medical devices based on clinical needs.

Authors:  Takao Hanawa
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 8.090

4.  Quantifying massive allograft healing of the canine femur in vivo and ex vivo: a pilot study.

Authors:  Brandon G Santoni; Nicole Ehrhart; Ricardo Betancourt-Benitez; Christopher A Beck; Edward M Schwarz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Assessment of a carbon fibre MRI flatbed insert for radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Maysam M Jafar; Jonathan Reeves; Matthieu A Ruthven; Christopher J Dean; Niall D MacDougall; Arthur T Tucker; Marc E Miquel
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Comparison of carbon fibre and titanium intramedullary nails in orthopaedic oncology.

Authors:  Caleb M Yeung; Abhiram R Bhashyam; Olivier Q Groot; Nelson Merchan; Erik T Newman; Kevin A Raskin; Santiago A Lozano-Calderón
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-08

7.  Rapid Personalised Virtual Planning and On-Demand Surgery for Acute Spinal Trauma Using 3D-Printing, Biomodelling and Patient-Specific Implant Manufacture.

Authors:  Ralph Jasper Mobbs; William C H Parr; Christopher Huang; Tajrian Amin
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-18

8.  Interactions between magnetic resonance imaging and dental material.

Authors:  Chalakuzhiyl Abraham Mathew; Sudhakara Maller
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2013-06

9.  Artifacts in spine magnetic resonance imaging due to different intervertebral test spacers: an in vitro evaluation of magnesium versus titanium and carbon-fiber-reinforced polymers as biomaterials.

Authors:  Thorsten Ernstberger; Gottfried Buchhorn; Gabert Heidrich
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intervertebral test spacers: an experimental comparison of magnesium versus titanium and carbon fiber reinforced polymers as biomaterials.

Authors:  T Ernstberger; G Buchhorn; G Heidrich
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 1.568

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.