Literature DB >> 30714008

3-dimensional printing for anterior cervical surgery: a review.

Wen Jie Choy1,2,3, William C H Parr1,2,3,4, Kevin Phan1,2,3,5, William R Walsh1,2,3, Ralph J Mobbs1,2,3,5.   

Abstract

Age-related degenerative changes and non-spondylotic pathologies of the cervical spine such as trauma and tumor can lead to compression of neurological structures and result in substantial alteration of the structural anatomy. The end-goal of surgical intervention is to decompress the neural structures which can be achieved via an anterior or a posterior approach, and stabilization of segments to restore stability and alignment. Three-dimensional printing (3DP or Additive Manufacturing) has been applied to the field of medicine, in particular orthopedics and neurosurgery. Coupled with advances of medical imaging such as computed tomography (CT) scans and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), accurate 3D models of patient anatomy can be produced, and patient-specific implants (PSIs) for complex anatomical reconstruction have all been applied with positive outcomes. 3D printed implants have been applied in particular to the cervical spine predominantly due to the complex and relatively small osteological anatomy and the proximity of important neurovascular structures to the surgical sites. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the current application of 3DP for cervical spinal implants. This includes a review on the available literature on 3D printed PSIs and current available 3D printed "off-the-shelf" (OTS) implants (3D-OTS). Suitable materials for 3DP of spinal implants and the future prospect of cervical implants will be discussed. The review will be concluded with a suggested guide for carrying future studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3DP for cervical spinal implants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-dimensional printing (3DP); anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF); anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF); cervical; custom-made spinal implant; off-the-shelf spinal implant; patient-specific implant (PSI); review; spine

Year:  2018        PMID: 30714008      PMCID: PMC6330582          DOI: 10.21037/jss.2018.12.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  74 in total

1.  A novel porous Ti6Al4V: characterization and cell attachment.

Authors:  J P Li; S H Li; C A Van Blitterswijk; K de Groot
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 2.  Clinical practice. Cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  Simon Carette; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Operative treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Raj D Rao; Krishnaj Gourab; Kenny S David
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Biomodeling as an aid to spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  Paul S D'Urso; Owen D Williamson; Robert G Thompson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: an update on its biology, epidemiology, and natural history.

Authors:  Joji Inamasu; Bernard H Guiot; Donald C Sachs
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  The interobserver-validated relevance of intervertebral spacer materials in MRI artifacting.

Authors:  T Ernstberger; G Heidrich; T Bruening; S Krefft; G Buchhorn; H M Klinger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Spinal biomodeling.

Authors:  P S D'Urso; G Askin; J S Earwaker; G S Merry; R G Thompson; T M Barker; D J Effeney
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Rarer causes of radiculopathy: spinal tumors, infections, and other unusual causes.

Authors:  Randy A Shelerud; Kirsten S Paynter
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.784

9.  Mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia and ectopic neuronal discharge after chronic compression of dorsal root ganglia.

Authors:  X J Song; S J Hu; K W Greenquist; J M Zhang; R H LaMotte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  In vivo biocompatibility testing of peek polymer for a spinal implant system: a study in rabbits.

Authors:  Charles-H Rivard; Souad Rhalmi; Christine Coillard
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2002-12-15
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  3D printed anatomical (bio)models in spine surgery: clinical benefits and value to health care providers.

Authors:  William C H Parr; Joshua L Burnard; Peter John Wilson; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12

2.  [Effectiveness of three-dimensional printing artificial vertebral body and interbody fusion Cage in anterior cervical surgery].

Authors:  Zhiqiang Wang; Haoyu Feng; Xun Ma; Chen Chen; Chen Deng; Lin Sun
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-09-15

3.  Low-Cost, Accurate, Effective Treatment of Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage With Three-Dimensional Printing Technology.

Authors:  Ke Li; Xiangqian Ding; Qingbo Wang; Gangxian Fan; Wei Guo; Chenglong Li; Meng Li; Zefu Li
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Improving the Management of Patients with Osteoporosis Undergoing Spinal Fusion: The Need for a Bone Mineral Density-Matched Interbody Cage.

Authors:  Steven M Falowski; Sebastian F Koga; Trent Northcutt; Laszlo Garamszegi; Jeremi Leasure; Jon E Block
Journal:  Orthop Res Rev       Date:  2021-12-14

5.  Application of three-dimensional reconstruction technology combined with three-dimensional printing in the treatment of pectus excavatum.

Authors:  Yibo Shan; Guiping Yu; Yi Lu; Hao Kong; Xuewei Jiang; Zhiming Shen; Fei Sun; Hongcan Shi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 2.535

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.