Literature DB >> 10616816

The postoperative spine.

C B Henk1, W Brodner, S Grampp, M Breitenseher, M Thurnher, G H Mostbeck, H Imhof.   

Abstract

During the last decade, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) mostly has replaced computed tomography for evaluation of spinal surgery patients. The inherent advantages of MRI are obvious for this particularly difficult field of imaging. With MRI, it is possible to demonstrate anatomic as well as pathological and iatrogenic changes in three different imaging planes and countless neighboring planes and to obtain a superior view of the complex postoperative situation regardless of the spinal level imaged. Soft-tissue masses in particular can be identified more readily and located within three-dimensional space. One of the major advantages is that the nature and histology of the mass can be estimated precisely using different MR sequences in combination with intravenous contrast media. The most important benefit may be demonstration of inflammatory and hemorrhagic masses in the early postoperative periods (with special emphasis on alterations visible in the spinal cord itself) as well as repair processes and ongoing degeneration in later stages. This visualization is possible even when their extent is limited. In the postoperative spine, the application of MRI was facilitated with the advent of new materials, such as titanium alloys, used for surgical instrumentation. These new materials limit the amount of artifacts visible on MR images. Earlier implants made of other metallic material prohibit the use of computed tomography in the spine. This article provides a brief overview of the progress in spinal surgery and focuses on the developments in MRI techniques during the last decade. Technical questions about imaging of spinal instrumentation are discussed. "Normal" postoperative findings needed for interpretation of pathologic conditions are also discussed. Finally, the most important frequently asked questions from referring surgeons that radiologists must be able to answer by MRI are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10616816     DOI: 10.1097/00002142-199908000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0899-3459


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Postoperative syndrome after spine surgery].

Authors:  F Ahlhelm; W Reith; N Naumann; G Schulte-Altedorneburg; P Papanagiotou; J Kelm; A Nabhan
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  The interobserver-validated relevance of intervertebral spacer materials in MRI artifacting.

Authors:  T Ernstberger; G Heidrich; T Bruening; S Krefft; G Buchhorn; H M Klinger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Symptomatic nerve root changes on contrast-enhanced MR imaging after surgery for lumbar disk herniation.

Authors:  Y S Lee; E S Choi; C J Song
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Current applications of advanced cross-sectional imaging techniques in evaluating the painful arthroplasty.

Authors:  Carolyn M Sofka
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  A Review on Biomaterials for Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology: From Past to Present.

Authors:  Grzegorz Szczęsny; Mateusz Kopec; Denis J Politis; Zbigniew L Kowalewski; Adam Łazarski; Tomasz Szolc
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 6.  Magnetic Resonance-Guided Passive Catheter Tracking for Endovascular Therapy.

Authors:  Fabio Settecase; Alastair J Martin; Prasheel Lillaney; Aaron Losey; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.266

7.  Artifacts in spine magnetic resonance imaging due to different intervertebral test spacers: an in vitro evaluation of magnesium versus titanium and carbon-fiber-reinforced polymers as biomaterials.

Authors:  Thorsten Ernstberger; Gottfried Buchhorn; Gabert Heidrich
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intervertebral test spacers: an experimental comparison of magnesium versus titanium and carbon fiber reinforced polymers as biomaterials.

Authors:  T Ernstberger; G Buchhorn; G Heidrich
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 1.568

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.