Literature DB >> 16441189

Focus cues affect perceived depth.

Simon J Watt1, Kurt Akeley, Marc O Ernst, Martin S Banks.   

Abstract

Depth information from focus cues--accommodation and the gradient of retinal blur--is typically incorrect in three-dimensional (3-D) displays because the light comes from a planar display surface. If the visual system incorporates information from focus cues into its calculation of 3-D scene parameters, this could cause distortions in perceived depth even when the 2-D retinal images are geometrically correct. In Experiment 1 we measured the direct contribution of focus cues to perceived slant by varying independently the physical slant of the display surface and the slant of a simulated surface specified by binocular disparity (binocular viewing) or perspective/texture (monocular viewing). In the binocular condition, slant estimates were unaffected by display slant. In the monocular condition, display slant had a systematic effect on slant estimates. Estimates were consistent with a weighted average of slant from focus cues and slant from disparity/texture, where the cue weights are determined by the reliability of each cue. In Experiment 2, we examined whether focus cues also have an indirect effect on perceived slant via the distance estimate used in disparity scaling. We varied independently the simulated distance and the focal distance to a disparity-defined 3-D stimulus. Perceived slant was systematically affected by changes in focal distance. Accordingly, depth constancy (with respect to simulated distance) was significantly reduced when focal distance was held constant compared to when it varied appropriately with the simulated distance to the stimulus. The results of both experiments show that focus cues can contribute to estimates of 3-D scene parameters. Inappropriate focus cues in typical 3-D displays may therefore contribute to distortions in perceived space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16441189      PMCID: PMC2667386          DOI: 10.1167/5.10.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  83 in total

1.  Ordinal depth information from accommodation?

Authors:  M Mon-Williams; J R Tresilian
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  The role of perspective effects and accelerations in perceived three-dimensional structure-from-motion.

Authors:  M A Hogervorst; R A Eagle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Blur discrimination and its relation to blur-mediated depth perception.

Authors:  George Mather; David R R Smith
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Motion parallax as a determinant of perceived depth.

Authors:  E J GIBSON; J J GIBSON; O W SMITH; H FLOCK
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-07

6.  Evidence for good recovery of lengths of real objects seen with natural stereo viewing.

Authors:  J P Frisby; D Buckley; P A Duke
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  The precision of proprioceptive position sense.

Authors:  R J van Beers; A C Sittig; J J Denier van der Gon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The effect of display size on disparity scaling from differential perspective and vergence cues.

Authors:  M F Bradshaw; A Glennerster; B J Rogers
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Stereoscopic depth constancy depends on the subject's task.

Authors:  A Glennerster; B J Rogers; M F Bradshaw
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Integration of depth modules: stereopsis and texture.

Authors:  E B Johnston; B G Cumming; A J Parker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  43 in total

1.  Focus information is used to interpret binocular images.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Multisensory calibration is independent of cue reliability.

Authors:  Adam Zaidel; Amanda H Turner; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Natural-scene statistics predict how the figure-ground cue of convexity affects human depth perception.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Charless C Fowlkes; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Spatial calibration of an optical see-through head-mounted display.

Authors:  Stuart J Gilson; Andrew W Fitzgibbon; Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Ahna R Girshick; Kurt Akeley; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  High-speed switchable lens enables the development of a volumetric stereoscopic display.

Authors:  Gordon D Love; David M Hoffman; Philip J W Hands; James Gao; Andrew K Kirby; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Stereo display with time-multiplexed focal adjustment.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Philip J W Hands; Andrew K Kirby; Gordon D Love; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2009

8.  Defocus blur discrimination in natural images with natural optics.

Authors:  Stephen Sebastian; Johannes Burge; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  Statistical approaches to identifying lapses in psychometric response data.

Authors:  Torin K Clark; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-04-06

10.  Consequences of Incorrect Focus Cues in Stereo Displays.

Authors:  Martin S Banks; Kurt Akeley; David M Hoffman; Ahna R Girshick
Journal:  J Soc Inf Disp       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 2.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.