Literature DB >> 21479104

Stereo display with time-multiplexed focal adjustment.

David M Hoffman1, Philip J W Hands, Andrew K Kirby, Gordon D Love, Martin S Banks.   

Abstract

In stereo displays, binocular disparity creates a striking impression of depth. However, such displays present focus cues-blur and accommodation-that specify a different depth than disparity, thereby causing a conflict. This conflict causes several problems including misperception of the 3D layout, difficulty fusing binocular images, and visual fatigue. To address these problems, we developed a display that preserves the advantages of conventional stereo displays, while presenting correct or nearly correct focus cues. In our new stereo display each eye views a display through a lens that switches between four focal distances at very high rate. The switches are synchronized to the display, so focal distance and the distance being simulated on the display are consistent or nearly consistent with one another. Focus cues for points in-between the four focal planes are simulated by using a depth-weighted blending technique. We will describe the design of the new display, discuss the retinal images it forms under various conditions, and describe an experiment that illustrates the effectiveness of the display in maximizing visual performance while minimizing visual fatigue.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21479104      PMCID: PMC3071605          DOI: 10.1117/12.807170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  11 in total

1.  The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence.

Authors:  E F FINCHAM; J WALTON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1957-08-06       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The effect of defocus on the contrast and phase of the retinal image of a sinusoidal grating.

Authors:  G Walsh; W N Charman
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Focus cues affect perceived depth.

Authors:  Simon J Watt; Kurt Akeley; Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Does the brain know the physics of specular reflection?

Authors:  A Blake; H Bülthoff
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-01-11       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Ahna R Girshick; Kurt Akeley; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Visual sensitivity to temporal change in focus and its relevance to the accommodation response.

Authors:  G Walsh; W N Charman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings.

Authors:  F W Campbell; J G Robson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  A comparison of accommodative responsiveness and contrast sensitivity for sinusoidal gratings.

Authors:  D A Owens
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.