Literature DB >> 12430948

Blur discrimination and its relation to blur-mediated depth perception.

George Mather1, David R R Smith.   

Abstract

Retinal images of three-dimensional scenes often contain regions that are spatially blurred by different amounts, owing to depth variation in the scene and depth-of-focus limitations in the eye. Variations in blur between regions in the retinal image therefore offer a cue to their relative physical depths. In the first experiment we investigated apparent depth ordering in images containing two regions of random texture separated by a vertical sinusoidal border. The texture was sharp on one side of the border, and blurred on the other side. In some presentations the border itself was also blurred. Results showed that blur variation alone is sufficient to determine the apparent depth ordering. A subsequent series of experiments measured blur-discrimination thresholds with stimuli similar to those used in the depth-ordering experiment. Weber fractions for blur discrimination ranged from 0.28 to 0.56. It is concluded that the utility of blur variation as a depth cue is constrained by the relatively mediocre ability of observers to discriminate different levels of blur. Blur is best viewed as a relatively coarse, qualitative depth cue.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12430948     DOI: 10.1068/p3254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  21 in total

1.  Focus information is used to interpret binocular images.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Focus cues affect perceived depth.

Authors:  Simon J Watt; Kurt Akeley; Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Ahna R Girshick; Kurt Akeley; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Defocus blur discrimination in natural images with natural optics.

Authors:  Stephen Sebastian; Johannes Burge; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Creating correct blur and its effect on accommodation.

Authors:  Steven A Cholewiak; Gordon D Love; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  On the number of perceivable blur levels in naturalistic images.

Authors:  Christopher Patrick Taylor; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Vestibular heading discrimination and sensitivity to linear acceleration in head and world coordinates.

Authors:  Paul R MacNeilage; Martin S Banks; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Using Blur to Affect Perceived Distance and Size.

Authors:  Robert T Held; Emily A Cooper; James F O'Brien; Martin S Banks
Journal:  ACM Trans Graph       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 5.414

9.  Edge-region grouping in figure-ground organization and depth perception.

Authors:  Stephen E Palmer; Joseph L Brooks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The utility of defocus blur in binocular depth perception.

Authors:  Dhanraj Vishwanath
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-08-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.