Literature DB >> 20616139

Focus information is used to interpret binocular images.

David M Hoffman1, Martin S Banks.   

Abstract

Focus information-blur and accommodation-is highly correlated with depth in natural viewing. We examined the use of focus information in solving the binocular correspondence problem and in interpreting monocular occlusions. We presented transparent scenes consisting of two planes. Observers judged the slant of the farther plane, which was seen through the nearer plane. To do this, they had to solve the correspondence problem. In one condition, the two planes were presented with sharp rendering on one image plane, as is done in conventional stereo displays. In another condition, the planes were presented on two image planes at different focal distances, simulating focus information in natural viewing. Depth discrimination performance improved significantly when focus information was correct, which shows that the visual system utilizes the information contained in depth-of-field blur in solving binocular correspondence. In a second experiment, we presented images in which one eye could see texture behind an occluder that the other eye could not see. When the occluder's texture was sharp along with the occluded texture, binocular rivalry was prominent. When the occluded and occluding textures were presented with different blurs, rivalry was significantly reduced. This shows that blur aids the interpretation of scene layout near monocular occlusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20616139      PMCID: PMC3071569          DOI: 10.1167/10.5.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  38 in total

1.  Blur discrimination and its relation to blur-mediated depth perception.

Authors:  George Mather; David R R Smith
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence.

Authors:  E F FINCHAM; J WALTON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1957-08-06       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  A study of consensual accommodation.

Authors:  E A W BALL
Journal:  Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom       Date:  1952-11

4.  Colour helps to solve the binocular matching problem.

Authors:  H E M den Ouden; R van Ee; E H F de Haan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Evidence for good recovery of lengths of real objects seen with natural stereo viewing.

Authors:  J P Frisby; D Buckley; P A Duke
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  A new sense for depth of field.

Authors:  A P Pentland
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 6.226

7.  A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  T J Mueller; R Blake
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  How contrast affects stereoacuity.

Authors:  D L Halpern; R R Blake
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Toward a general theory of stereopsis: binocular matching, occluding contours, and fusion.

Authors:  B L Anderson; K Nakayama
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Binocular rivalry: suppression depends on orientation and spatial frequency.

Authors:  M Fahle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  9 in total

1.  Brightness induction and suprathreshold vision: effects of age and visual field.

Authors:  Mark E McCourt; Lynnette M Leone; Barbara Blakeslee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Single neural code for blur in subjects with different interocular optical blur orientation.

Authors:  Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan; Lucie Sawides; Carlos Dorronsoro; Eli Peli; Susana Marcos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Visual discomfort and depth-of-field.

Authors:  Louise O'Hare; Tingting Zhang; Harold T Nefs; Paul B Hibbard
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-05-16

4.  Blur perception throughout the visual field in myopia and emmetropia.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Lenna Walker; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress.

Authors:  Miroslav Dostalek; Karel Fliegel; Ladislav Dusek; Tomas Lukes; Jan Hejda; Michaela Duchackova; Jiri Hozman; Rudolf Autrata
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 0.957

6.  Stereoscopic depth constancy for physical objects and their virtual counterparts.

Authors:  Brittney Hartle; Laurie M Wilcox
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The (In)Effectiveness of Simulated Blur for Depth Perception in Naturalistic Images.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Manuela Chessa; Fabio Solari; Peter J Bex
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Binocular temporal visual processing in myopia.

Authors:  Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Peter J Bex; Adriana Ferreira; Anna Kosovicheva
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Natural statistics of depth edges modulate perceptual stability.

Authors:  Zeynep Basgöze; David N White; Johannes Burge; Emily A Cooper
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.