Literature DB >> 26230495

Masking Period Patterns and Forward Masking for Speech-Shaped Noise: Age-Related Effects.

John H Grose1, Denise C Menezes, Heather L Porter, Silvana Griz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess age-related changes in temporal resolution in listeners with relatively normal audiograms. The hypothesis was that increased susceptibility to nonsimultaneous masking contributes to the hearing difficulties experienced by older listeners in complex fluctuating backgrounds.
DESIGN: Participants included younger (n = 11), middle-age (n = 12), and older (n = 11) listeners with relatively normal audiograms. The first phase of the study measured masking period patterns for speech-shaped noise maskers and signals. From these data, temporal window shapes were derived. The second phase measured forward-masking functions and assessed how well the temporal window fits accounted for these data.
RESULTS: The masking period patterns demonstrated increased susceptibility to backward masking in the older listeners, compatible with a more symmetric temporal window in this group. The forward-masking functions exhibited an age-related decline in recovery to baseline thresholds, and there was also an increase in the variability of the temporal window fits to these data.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated an age-related increase in susceptibility to nonsimultaneous masking, supporting the hypothesis that exacerbated nonsimultaneous masking contributes to age-related difficulties understanding speech in fluctuating noise. Further support for this hypothesis comes from limited speech-in-noise data, suggesting an association between susceptibility to forward masking and speech understanding in modulated noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26230495      PMCID: PMC4684469          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  28 in total

1.  Age differences in backward masking.

Authors:  S E Gehr; M S Sommers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Intensity discrimination and increment detection in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Gail S Donaldson; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Masking period patterns of harmonic complex tones.

Authors:  E Zwicker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The monaural temporal window based on masking period pattern data in school-aged children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Shuman He; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Contralateral cueing effects in backward masking.

Authors:  J S Puleo; R E Pastore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Frequency modulation detection as a measure of temporal processing: age-related monaural and binaural effects.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Temporal resolution in hard-of-hearing patients.

Authors:  E Zwicker; K Schorn
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1982
View more
  9 in total

1.  Forward Masking of the Speech-Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Sarah E Hodge; Denise C Menezes; Kevin D Brown; John H Grose
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Auditory brainstem response latency in forward masking, a marker of sensory deficits in listeners with normal hearing thresholds.

Authors:  Golbarg Mehraei; Andreu Paredes Gallardo; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Masking Release for Speech in Modulated Maskers: Electrophysiological and Behavioral Measures.

Authors:  A Michelle Tanner; Emily R Spitzer; J P Hyzy; John H Grose
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Stimulus context affects the phonemic categorization of temporally based word contrasts in adult cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Samira Anderson; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perceptual sensitivity to, and electrophysiological encoding of, a complex periodic signal: effects of age.

Authors:  Sara K Mamo; John H Grose; Emily Buss
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Temporal Processing Deficits in Middle Age.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.493

7.  Binaural Frequency Modulation Detection in School-Age Children, Young Adults, and Older Adults: Effects of Interaural Modulator Phase.

Authors:  Stacey G Kane; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

8.  Differences in Auditory Perception Between Young and Older Adults When Controlling for Differences in Hearing Loss and Cognition.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lentz; Larry E Humes; Gary R Kidd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Evidence of Validity and Normative Values of a New Auditory Backward Masking Test.

Authors:  Renata Filippini; Carlos Alberto Leite Filho; Gabriela Melo Santos Bonassa Barros; Frank E Musiek; Eliane Schochat
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.964

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.