Literature DB >> 3356815

The shape of the ear's temporal window.

B C Moore1, B R Glasberg, C J Plack, A K Biswas.   

Abstract

This article examines the idea that the temporal resolution of the auditory system can be modeled using a temporal window (an intensity weighting function) analogous to the auditory filter measured in the frequency domain. To estimate the shape of the hypothetical temporal window, threshold was measured for a brief sinusoidal signal presented in a temporal gap between two bursts of noise. The duration of the gap was systematically varied and the signal was placed both symmetrically and asymmetrically within the gap. The data were analyzed by assuming that the temporal window had the form of a simple mathematical expression with a small number of free parameters. The values of the parameters were adjusted to give the best fit to the data. The analysis assumed that, for each condition, the temporal window was centered at the time giving the highest signal-to-masker ratio, and that threshold corresponded to a fixed ratio of signal energy to masker energy at the output of the window. The data were fitted well by modeling each side of the window as the sum of two rounded-exponential functions. The window was highly asymmetric, having a shallower slope for times before the center than for times after. The equivalent rectangular duration (ERD) of the window was typically about 8 ms. The ERD increased slightly when the masker level was decreased, but did not differ significantly for signal frequencies of 500 and 2000 Hz. The temporal-window model successfully accounts for the data from a variety of experiments measuring temporal resolution. However, it fails to predict certain aspects of forward masking and of the detection of amplitude modulation at high rates.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3356815     DOI: 10.1121/1.396055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  47 in total

1.  Theta and Gamma Bands Encode Acoustic Dynamics over Wide-Ranging Timescales.

Authors:  Xiangbin Teng; David Poeppel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Forward masking in the amplitude-modulation domain for tone carriers: psychophysical results and physiological correlates.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Paul C Nelson; Neal F Viemeister; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-23

3.  Modulation masking produced by second-order modulators.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Brian C J Moore; Laurent Demany; Stephan D Ewert; Stanley Sheft; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Psychophysical estimates of nonlinear cochlear processing in younger and older listeners.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  An examination of speech recognition in a modulated background and of forward masking in younger and older listeners.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Sid P Bacon; Erica J Williams
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 6.  Basic auditory processes involved in the analysis of speech sounds.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  A temporal window for lateralization of interaural time difference by barn owls.

Authors:  H Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Precursor effects on behavioral estimates of frequency selectivity and gain in forward masking.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Temporal integration in vowel perception.

Authors:  Andrew B Wallace; Sheila E Blumstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Suppression of spontaneous firing in inferior colliculus neurons during sound processing.

Authors:  S V Voytenko; A V Galazyuk
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.