Literature DB >> 16289206

Contour interactions between pairs of Gabors engaged in binocular rivalry reveal a map of the association field.

David Alais1, Jean Lorenceau, Roberto Arrighi, John Cass.   

Abstract

A psychophysical study was conducted to investigate contour interactions (the 'association field'). Two Gabor patches were presented to one eye, with random-dot patches in corresponding locations of the other eye so as to produce binocular rivalry. Perceptual alternations of the two rivalry processes were monitored continuously by observers and the two time series were cross-correlated. The Gabors were oriented collinearly, obliquely, or orthogonally, and spatial separation was varied. A parallel condition was also included. Correlation between the rivalry processes strongly depended on separation and relative orientation. Correlations between adjacent collinear Gabors was near-perfect and reduced with spatial separation and as relative orientation departed from collinear. Importantly, variations in cross-correlation did not alter the rivalry processes (average dominance duration, and therefore alternation rate, was constant across conditions). Instead, synchronisation of rivalry oscillations accounts for the correlation variations: rivalry alternations were highly synchronised when contour interactions were strong and were poorly synchronised when contour interactions were weak. The level of synchrony between these two stochastic processes, in depending on separation and relative orientation, effectively reveals a map of the association field. These association fields are not greatly affected by contrast, and can be demonstrated between contours that are presented to separate hemispheres.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16289206     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.09.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  11 in total

1.  Natural images dominate in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Erich W Graf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Disambiguating the roles of area V1 and the lateral occipital complex (LOC) in contour integration.

Authors:  Marina Shpaner; Sophie Molholm; Emmajane Forde; John J Foxe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  When can attention influence binocular rivalry?

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Michael D Melnick; Duje Tadin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Dynamics of temporally interleaved percept-choice sequences: interaction via adaptation in shared neural populations.

Authors:  André J Noest; Richard J A van Wezel
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Modulation of spatiotemporal dynamics of binocular rivalry by collinear facilitation and pattern-dependent adaptation.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Sang-Hun Lee; June Kim; David Heeger; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  Binocular vision.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Hugh Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Size matters: a study of binocular rivalry dynamics.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Vision and audition do not share attentional resources in sustained tasks.

Authors:  Roberto Arrighi; Roy Lunardi; David Burr
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-04-05

9.  An integrated framework of spatiotemporal dynamics of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Crossmodal constraints on human perceptual awareness: auditory semantic modulation of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Yi-Chuan Chen; Su-Ling Yeh; Charles Spence
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-09-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.