Literature DB >> 25898898

When can attention influence binocular rivalry?

Kevin C Dieter1, Michael D Melnick, Duje Tadin.   

Abstract

Attentional influence over perception is particularly pronounced when sensory stimulation is ambiguous, where attention can reduce stimulus uncertainty and promote a stable interpretation of the world. However, binocular rivalry, an extensively studied visual ambiguity, has proved to be comparatively resistant to attentional modulation. We hypothesize that this apparent inconsistency reflects fluctuations in the degree of unresolved competition during binocular rivalry. Namely, attentional influence over rivalry dynamics should be limited to phases of relatively unresolved stimulus competition, such as ends of individual dominance periods. We found that transient, feature-based cues congruent with the dominant stimulus prolonged dominance durations, while cues matching the suppressed stimulus hastened its return to dominance. Notably, the effect of cues depended on when the cues are presented. Cues presented late, but not early, during a given episode of perceptual dominance influenced rivalry dynamics. This temporal pattern mirrors known changes in the relative competitive dynamics of rival stimuli, revealing that selective effects occur only during temporal windows containing weak resolution of visual competition. In conclusion, these findings reveal that unresolved competition, which gates attention across a variety of domains, is also crucial in determining the susceptibility of binocular rivalry to selective influences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25898898      PMCID: PMC4522198          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0905-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  43 in total

Review 1.  Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Spatial interactions in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  H Fukuda; R Blake
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sang Chul Chong; Duje Tadin; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Attention speeds binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Chris L E Paffen; David Alais; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-09

5.  Influence of emotional facial expressions on binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Rachel L Bannerman; Maarten Milders; Beatrice De Gelder; Arash Sahraie
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  T J Mueller; R Blake
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Interactions of top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Stephanie McMains; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The visual impact of gossip.

Authors:  Eric Anderson; Erika H Siegel; Eliza Bliss-Moreau; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Why visual attention and awareness are different.

Authors:  Victor A.F. Lamme
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  10 in total

1.  Perceptual training profoundly alters binocular rivalry through both sensory and attentional enhancements.

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Michael D Melnick; Duje Tadin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Does visual attention drive the dynamics of bistable perception?

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Jan Brascamp; Duje Tadin; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Attention cueing in rivalry: insights from pupillometry.

Authors:  Miriam Acquafredda; Paola Binda; Claudia Lunghi
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-06-03

4.  Shifting eye balance using monocularly directed attention in normal vision.

Authors:  Sandy P Wong; Alex S Baldwin; Robert F Hess; Kathy T Mullen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Motion-induced blindness continues outside visual awareness and without attention.

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Duje Tadin; Joel Pearson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Between-Subject Variability in the Breaking Continuous Flash Suppression Paradigm: Potential Causes, Consequences, and Solutions.

Authors:  Surya Gayet; Timo Stein
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-27

7.  Battle of the Mondrians: Investigating the Role of Unpredictability in Continuous Flash Suppression.

Authors:  Shui'Er Han; David Alais; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2018-08-22

8.  Attention periodically samples competing stimuli during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Jeroen Ja van Boxtel; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Matthew J Davidson; David Alais
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Evidence for neural rhythms embedded within binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Oakyoon Cha; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  fMRI neurofeedback of higher visual areas and perceptual biases.

Authors:  I Habes; S Rushton; S J Johnston; M O Sokunbi; K Barawi; M Brosnan; T Daly; N Ihssen; D E J Linden
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 3.139

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.