Literature DB >> 19289828

Natural images dominate in binocular rivalry.

Daniel H Baker1, Erich W Graf.   

Abstract

Ecological approaches to perception have demonstrated that information encoding by the visual system is informed by the natural environment, both in terms of simple image attributes like luminance and contrast, and more complex relationships corresponding to Gestalt principles of perceptual organization. Here, we ask if this optimization biases perception of visual inputs that are perceptually bistable. Using the binocular rivalry paradigm, we designed stimuli that varied in either their spatiotemporal amplitude spectra or their phase spectra. We found that noise stimuli with "natural" amplitude spectra (i.e., amplitude content proportional to 1/f, where f is spatial or temporal frequency) dominate over those with any other systematic spectral slope, along both spatial and temporal dimensions. This could not be explained by perceived contrast measurements, and occurred even though all stimuli had equal energy. Calculating the effective contrast following attenuation by a model contrast sensitivity function suggested that the strong contrast dependency of rivalry provides the mechanism by which binocular vision is optimized for viewing natural images. We also compared rivalry between natural and phase-scrambled images and found a strong preference for natural phase spectra that could not be accounted for by observer biases in a control task. We propose that this phase specificity relates to contour information, and arises either from the activity of V1 complex cells, or from later visual areas, consistent with recent neuroimaging and single-cell work. Our findings demonstrate that human vision integrates information across space, time, and phase to select the input most likely to hold behavioral relevance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19289828      PMCID: PMC2663995          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0812860106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  54 in total

1.  Spatial interactions in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  H Fukuda; R Blake
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  A standard model for foveal detection of spatial contrast.

Authors:  Andrew B Watson; Albert J Ahumada
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Evidence for two interacting temporal channels in human visual processing.

Authors:  John Cass; David Alais
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Dissociating task performance from fMRI repetition attenuation in ventral visual cortex.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu; Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Spatial dependencies between local luminance and contrast in natural images.

Authors:  Jussi T Lindgren; Jarmo Hurri; Aapo Hyvärinen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Surface organization influences bistable vision.

Authors:  Erich W Graf; Wendy J Adams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Interactions between global motion and local binocular rivalry.

Authors:  D Alais; R Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  I Kovács; T V Papathomas; M Yang; A Fehér
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Discrimination of amplitude spectrum slope in the fovea and parafovea and the local amplitude distributions of natural scene imagery.

Authors:  Bruce C Hansen; Robert F Hess
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Faces and objects in macaque cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Doris Y Tsao; Winrich A Freiwald; Tamara A Knutsen; Joseph B Mandeville; Roger B H Tootell
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  23 in total

1.  Deconstructing continuous flash suppression.

Authors:  Eunice Yang; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  United we sense, divided we fail: context-driven perception of ambiguous visual stimuli.

Authors:  P C Klink; R J A van Wezel; R van Ee
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Entrainment of visual steady-state responses is modulated by global spatial statistics.

Authors:  Thomas Nguyen; Karl Kuntzelman; Vladimir Miskovic
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Auditory and tactile signals combine to influence vision during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Claudia Lunghi; Maria Concetta Morrone; David Alais
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Can binocular rivalry reveal neural correlates of consciousness?

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Jan Brascamp; David J Heeger
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  GABAergic Inhibition Gates Perceptual Awareness During Binocular Rivalry.

Authors:  Jeff Mentch; Alina Spiegel; Catherine Ricciardi; Caroline E Robertson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Determinants of neural responses to disparity in natural scenes.

Authors:  Yiran Duan; Alexandra Yakovleva; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Effects of mean luminance changes on human contrast perception: contrast dependence, time-course and spatial specificity.

Authors:  Markku Kilpeläinen; Lauri Nurminen; Kristian Donner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Why is Binocular Rivalry Uncommon? Discrepant Monocular Images in the Real World.

Authors:  Derek Henry Arnold
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Slower rate of binocular rivalry in autism.

Authors:  Caroline E Robertson; Dwight J Kravitz; Jan Freyberg; Simon Baron-Cohen; Chris I Baker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.