Literature DB >> 21717181

Dynamics of temporally interleaved percept-choice sequences: interaction via adaptation in shared neural populations.

André J Noest1, Richard J A van Wezel.   

Abstract

At the onset of visually ambiguous or conflicting stimuli, our visual system quickly 'chooses' one of the possible percepts. Interrupted presentation of the same stimuli has revealed that each percept-choice depends strongly on the history of previous choices and the duration of the interruptions. Recent psychophysics and modeling has discovered increasingly rich dynamical structure in such percept-choice sequences, and explained or predicted these patterns in terms of simple neural mechanisms: fast cross-inhibition and slow shunting adaptation that also causes a near-threshold facilitatory effect. However, we still lack a clear understanding of the dynamical interactions between two distinct, temporally interleaved, percept-choice sequences-a type of experiment that probes which feature-level neural network connectivity and dynamics allow the visual system to resolve the vast ambiguity of everyday vision. Here, we fill this gap. We first show that a simple column-structured neural network captures the known phenomenology, and then identify and analyze the crucial underlying mechanism via two stages of model-reduction: A 6-population reduction shows how temporally well-separated sequences become coupled via adaptation in neurons that are shared between the populations driven by either of the two sequences. The essential dynamics can then be reduced further, to a set of iterated adaptation-maps. This enables detailed analysis, resulting in the prediction of phase-diagrams of possible sequence-pair patterns and their response to perturbations. These predictions invite a variety of future experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21717181      PMCID: PMC3273687          DOI: 10.1007/s10827-011-0347-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Neurosci        ISSN: 0929-5313            Impact factor:   1.621


  29 in total

1.  Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Melanie Wilke; Alexander Maier; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Perception of temporally interleaved ambiguous patterns.

Authors:  Alexander Maier; Melanie Wilke; Nikos K Logothetis; David A Leopold
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Local factors determine the stabilization of monocular ambiguous and binocular rivalry stimuli.

Authors:  Xiangchuan Chen; Sheng He
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-06-08       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Competition in bistable vision is attribute-specific.

Authors:  Jon K Grossmann; Allan C Dobbins
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Subjective appearance of ambiguous structure-from-motion can be driven by objective switches of a separate less ambiguous context.

Authors:  Elliot D Freeman; Jon Driver
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Sensory memory for ambiguous vision.

Authors:  Joel Pearson; Jan Brascamp
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Early interactions between neuronal adaptation and voluntary control determine perceptual choices in bistable vision.

Authors:  P C Klink; R van Ee; M M Nijs; G J Brouwer; A J Noest; R J A van Wezel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  The impact of stimulus complexity and frequency swapping on stabilization of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Kristian Sandberg; Bahador Bahrami; Jonas Kristoffer Lindeløv; Morten Overgaard; Geraint Rees
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  The spatial properties of binocular suppression zone.

Authors:  L Liu; C M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Intermittent ambiguous stimuli: implicit memory causes periodic perceptual alternations.

Authors:  J W Brascamp; J Pearson; R Blake; A V van den Berg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  A monocular contribution to stimulus rivalry.

Authors:  Jan Brascamp; Hansem Sohn; Sang-Hun Lee; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Changes in low-level neural properties underlie age-dependent visual decision making.

Authors:  Elahe Arani; Raymond van Ee; Richard van Wezel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.