Literature DB >> 16266097

Computer-aided detection of breast masses on full field digital mammograms.

Jun Wei1, Berkman Sahiner, Lubomir M Hadjiiski, Heang-Ping Chan, Nicholas Petrick, Mark A Helvie, Marilyn A Roubidoux, Jun Ge, Chuan Zhou.   

Abstract

We are developing a computer-aided detection (CAD) system for breast masses on full field digital mammographic (FFDM) images. To develop a CAD system that is independent of the FFDM manufacturer's proprietary preprocessing methods, we used the raw FFDM image as input and developed a multiresolution preprocessing scheme for image enhancement. A two-stage prescreening method that combines gradient field analysis with gray level information was developed to identify mass candidates on the processed images. The suspicious structure in each identified region was extracted by clustering-based region growing. Morphological and spatial gray-level dependence texture features were extracted for each suspicious object. Stepwise linear discriminant analysis (LDA) with simplex optimization was used to select the most useful features. Finally, rule-based and LDA classifiers were designed to differentiate masses from normal tissues. Two data sets were collected: a mass data set containing 110 cases of two-view mammograms with a total of 220 images, and a no-mass data set containing 90 cases of two-view mammograms with a total of 180 images. All cases were acquired with a GE Senographe 2000D FFDM system. The true locations of the masses were identified by an experienced radiologist. Free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to evaluate the performance of the CAD system. It was found that our CAD system achieved a case-based sensitivity of 70%, 80%, and 90% at 0.72, 1.08, and 1.82 false positive (FP) marks/image on the mass data set. The FP rates on the no-mass data set were 0.85, 1.31, and 2.14 FP marks/image, respectively, at the corresponding sensitivities. This study demonstrated the usefulness of our CAD techniques for automated detection of masses on FFDM images.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16266097      PMCID: PMC2742215          DOI: 10.1118/1.1997327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  42 in total

1.  Feature selection and classifier performance in computer-aided diagnosis: the effect of finite sample size.

Authors:  B Sahiner; H P Chan; N Petrick; R F Wagner; L Hadjiiski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection.

Authors:  R L Birdwell; D M Ikeda; K F O'Shaughnessy; E A Sickles
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Automated detection of breast masses on mammograms using adaptive contrast enhancement and texture classification.

Authors:  N Petrick; H P Chan; D Wei; B Sahiner; M A Helvie; D D Adler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Maximum likelihood analysis of free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) data.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample.

Authors:  C A Beam; P M Layde; D C Sullivan
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-01-22

7.  A fully automated system for screening xeromammograms.

Authors:  J L Semmlow; A Shadagopappan; L V Ackerman; W Hand; F S Alcorn
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1980-08

8.  On techniques for detecting circumscribed masses in mammograms.

Authors:  S M Lai; X Li; W F Biscof
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions.

Authors:  W P Kegelmeyer; J M Pruneda; P D Bourland; A Hillis; M W Riggs; M L Nipper
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark A Helvie; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Erini Makariou; Heang-Ping Chan; Nicholas Petrick; Berkman Sahiner; Shih-Chung B Lo; Matthew Freedman; Dorit Adler; Janet Bailey; Caroline Blane; Donna Hoff; Karen Hunt; Lynn Joynt; Katherine Klein; Chintana Paramagul; Stephanie K Patterson; Marilyn A Roubidoux
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  25 in total

1.  Breast masses detection using phase portrait analysis and fuzzy inference systems.

Authors:  Arianna Mencattini; Marcello Salmeri
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Dual system approach to computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Berkman Sahiner; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Chuan Zhou; Jun Ge
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Optimized approach to decision fusion of heterogeneous data for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Jonathan L Jesneck; Loren W Nolte; Jay A Baker; Carey E Floyd; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Bilateral analysis based false positive reduction for computer-aided mass detection.

Authors:  Yi-Ta Wu; Jun Wei; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Chuan Zhou; Jun Ge; Jiazheng Shi; Yiheng Zhang; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Characterization of mammographic masses based on level set segmentation with new image features and patient information.

Authors:  Jiazheng Shi; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Jun Ge; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie; Alexis Nees; Yi-Ta Wu; Jun Wei; Chuan Zhou; Yiheng Zhang; Jing Cui
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Jun Ge; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Mark A Helvie; Chuan Zhou; Yi-Ta Wu; Chintana Paramagul; Yiheng Zhang
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Synthesizing mammogram from digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Mark A Helvie; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Colleen H Neal; Yao Lu; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Chuan Zhou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Computer-aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: comparison of three approaches.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan; Jun Wei; Yiheng Zhang; Mark A Helvie; Richard H Moore; Berkman Sahiner; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Automated breast mass detection in 3D reconstructed tomosynthesis volumes: a featureless approach.

Authors:  Swatee Singh; Georgia D Tourassi; Jay A Baker; Ehsan Samei; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Computer-aided assessment of breast density: comparison of supervised deep learning and feature-based statistical learning.

Authors:  Songfeng Li; Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Mark A Helvie; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Yao Lu; Chuan Zhou; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Ravi K Samala
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.