Literature DB >> 8946366

Automated detection of breast masses on mammograms using adaptive contrast enhancement and texture classification.

N Petrick1, H P Chan, D Wei, B Sahiner, M A Helvie, D D Adler.   

Abstract

This paper presents segmentation and classification results of an automated algorithm for the detection of breast masses on digitized mammograms. Potential mass regions were first identified using density-weighted contrast enhancement (DWCE) segmentation applied to single-view mammograms. Once the potential mass regions had been identified, multiresolution texture features extracted from wavelet coefficients were calculated, and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was used to classify the regions as breast masses or normal tissue. In this article the overall detection results for two independent sets of 84 mammograms used alternately for training and test were evaluated by free-response receiver operating characteristics (FROC) analysis. The test results indicate that this new algorithm produced approximately 4.4 false positive per image at a true positive detection rate of 90% and 2.3 false positives per image at a true positive rate of 80%.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8946366     DOI: 10.1118/1.597756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  16 in total

1.  Feature selection and classifier performance in computer-aided diagnosis: the effect of finite sample size.

Authors:  B Sahiner; H P Chan; N Petrick; R F Wagner; L Hadjiiski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Radial-searching contour extraction method based on a modified active contour model for mammographic masses.

Authors:  Toshiaki Nakagawa; Takeshi Hara; Hiroshi Fujita; Katsuhei Horita; Takuji Iwase; Tokiko Endo
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2008-05-08

3.  Mass Detection in Mammographic Images Using Wavelet Processing and Adaptive Threshold Technique.

Authors:  P S Vikhe; V R Thool
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Computer-aided detection of breast masses on full field digital mammograms.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Berkman Sahiner; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Heang-Ping Chan; Nicholas Petrick; Mark A Helvie; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Jun Ge; Chuan Zhou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Usefulness of texture analysis for computerized classification of breast lesions on mammograms.

Authors:  Roberto R Pereira; Paulo M Azevedo Marques; Marcelo O Honda; Sergio K Kinoshita; Roger Engelmann; Chisako Muramatsu; Kunio Doi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Dual system approach to computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Berkman Sahiner; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Chuan Zhou; Jun Ge
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Optimized approach to decision fusion of heterogeneous data for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Jonathan L Jesneck; Loren W Nolte; Jay A Baker; Carey E Floyd; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Mammographic mass detection using a mass template.

Authors:  Serhat Ozekes; Onur Osman; A Yilmaz Camurcu
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 9.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.

Authors:  Maryellen L Giger; Heang-Ping Chan; John Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Radiomics: a new application from established techniques.

Authors:  Vishwa Parekh; Michael A Jacobs
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2016-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.