Literature DB >> 21987360

Breast masses detection using phase portrait analysis and fuzzy inference systems.

Arianna Mencattini1, Marcello Salmeri.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Breast masses exhibit variability in margins, shapes, and dimensions, so their detection is a difficult task in mammographic computer-aided diagnosis. Mass detection is usually a two-step procedure: mass identification and false-positive reduction. A new method to automatically detect mass lesions in mammographic images with tuning according to the breast tissue density was developed and tested.
METHODS: A modified phase portrait analysis method was introduced, based on the eigenvalue condition number and an eigenvalue intensity map. The method uses an iterative and tissue density-adaptive segmentation procedure with extraction of geometric features. False-positive reduction is accomplished using a fuzzy inference-based classifier. A leave-one-image-out cross-validation procedure was implemented, and stepwise regression analysis was used to automatically extract an optimal set of features. Testing and validation were performed on two different data sets containing at least one malignant mass D1 (388 images) and D2 (674 images), and a third data set N1 (50 images) was used consisting of normal controls. These three data sets were taken from the Digital Database for Screening Mammography.
RESULTS: For sensitivities of 0.9, 0.85, 0.80, and 0.75, the best results on cancer images exhibit an False-Positive per Image (FPpI) equal to 0.6, 0.45, 0.35, and 0.3, respectively, using a Bayes Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) classifier and an FPpI of 0.85, 0.7, 0.55, and 0.45 using a fuzzy inference system (FIS) for false-positive reduction. When the algorithm is tested on normal images, an FPpI equal to 0.4, 0.3, 0.25, and 0.2 was observed using LDA and 0.3, 0.25, 0.2, and 0.15 using the FIS.
CONCLUSION: A preclinical study of an automatic breast mass detection algorithm provided promising results in terms of sensitivity and low false-positive rate. Further development and clinical testing are justified based on the results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21987360     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-011-0659-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  17 in total

1.  Gradient and texture analysis for the classification of mammographic masses.

Authors:  N R Mudigonda; R M Rangayyan; J E Desautels
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  A new 2D segmentation method based on dynamic programming applied to computer aided detection in mammography.

Authors:  Sheila Timp; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A novel featureless approach to mass detection in digital mammograms based on support vector machines.

Authors:  Renato Campanini; Danilo Dongiovanni; Emiro Iampieri; Nico Lanconelli; Matteo Masotti; Giuseppe Palermo; Alessandro Riccardi; Matteo Roffilli
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-03-21       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database.

Authors:  R Bellotti; F De Carlo; S Tangaro; G Gargano; G Maggipinto; M Castellano; R Massafra; D Cascio; F Fauci; R Magro; G Raso; A Lauria; G Forni; S Bagnasco; P Cerello; E Zanon; S C Cheran; E Lopez Torres; U Bottigli; G L Masala; P Oliva; A Retico; M E Fantacci; R Cataldo; I De Mitri; G De Nunzio
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography.

Authors:  Nevine H Eltonsy; Georgia D Tourassi; Adel S Elmaghraby
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Automated detection of masses in mammograms by local adaptive thresholding.

Authors:  Guillaume Kom; Alain Tiedeu; Martin Kom
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 4.589

7.  Active contours without edges.

Authors:  T F Chan; L A Vese
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 10.856

8.  Classification of mass and normal breast tissue: a convolution neural network classifier with spatial domain and texture images.

Authors:  B Sahiner; H P Chan; N Petrick; D Wei; M A Helvie; D D Adler; M M Goodsitt
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions.

Authors:  W P Kegelmeyer; J M Pruneda; P D Bourland; A Hillis; M W Riggs; M L Nipper
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Automatic identification of the pectoral muscle in mammograms.

Authors:  R J Ferrari; R M Rangayyan; J E L Desautels; R A Borges; A F Frère
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  3 in total

1.  Automatic detection of the nipple in screen-film and full-field digital mammograms using a novel Hessian-based method.

Authors:  Paola Casti; Arianna Mencattini; Marcello Salmeri; Antonietta Ancona; Fabio Felice Mangieri; Maria Luisa Pepe; Rangaraj Mandayam Rangayyan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Extracting fuzzy classification rules from texture segmented HRCT lung images.

Authors:  Manish Kakar; Arianna Mencattini; Marcello Salmeri
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Breast Mass Detection in Digital Mammogram Based on Gestalt Psychology.

Authors:  Hongyu Wang; Jun Feng; Qirong Bu; Feihong Liu; Min Zhang; Yu Ren; Yi Lv
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.682

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.