Literature DB >> 29210358

Computer-aided assessment of breast density: comparison of supervised deep learning and feature-based statistical learning.

Songfeng Li1, Jun Wei, Heang-Ping Chan, Mark A Helvie, Marilyn A Roubidoux, Yao Lu, Chuan Zhou, Lubomir M Hadjiiski, Ravi K Samala.   

Abstract

Breast density is one of the most significant factors that is associated with cancer risk. In this study, our purpose was to develop a supervised deep learning approach for automated estimation of percentage density (PD) on digital mammograms (DMs). The input 'for processing' DMs was first log-transformed, enhanced by a multi-resolution preprocessing scheme, and subsampled to a pixel size of 800 µm  ×  800 µm from 100 µm  ×  100 µm. A deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) was trained to estimate a probability map of breast density (PMD) by using a domain adaptation resampling method. The PD was estimated as the ratio of the dense area to the breast area based on the PMD. The DCNN approach was compared to a feature-based statistical learning approach. Gray level, texture and morphological features were extracted and a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator was used to combine the features into a feature-based PMD. With approval of the Institutional Review Board, we retrospectively collected a training set of 478 DMs and an independent test set of 183 DMs from patient files in our institution. Two experienced mammography quality standards act radiologists interactively segmented PD as the reference standard. Ten-fold cross-validation was used for model selection and evaluation with the training set. With cross-validation, DCNN obtained a Dice's coefficient (DC) of 0.79  ±  0.13 and Pearson's correlation (r) of 0.97, whereas feature-based learning obtained DC  =  0.72  ±  0.18 and r  =  0.85. For the independent test set, DCNN achieved DC  =  0.76  ±  0.09 and r  =  0.94, while feature-based learning achieved DC  =  0.62  ±  0.21 and r  =  0.75. Our DCNN approach was significantly better and more robust than the feature-based learning approach for automated PD estimation on DMs, demonstrating its potential use for automated density reporting as well as for model-based risk prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29210358      PMCID: PMC5784848          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa9f87

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  30 in total

1.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment.

Authors:  W A Berg; C Campassi; P Langenberg; M J Sexton
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Computerized image analysis: estimation of breast density on mammograms.

Authors:  C Zhou; H P Chan; N Petrick; M A Helvie; M M Goodsitt; B Sahiner; L M Hadjiiski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Classification of mass and normal breast tissue: a convolution neural network classifier with spatial domain and texture images.

Authors:  B Sahiner; H P Chan; N Petrick; D Wei; M A Helvie; D D Adler; M M Goodsitt
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Breast Density Analysis Using an Automatic Density Segmentation Algorithm.

Authors:  Arnau Oliver; Meritxell Tortajada; Xavier Lladó; Jordi Freixenet; Sergi Ganau; Lidia Tortajada; Mariona Vilagran; Melcior Sentís; Robert Martí
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Computer-aided detection of mammographic microcalcifications: pattern recognition with an artificial neural network.

Authors:  H P Chan; S C Lo; B Sahiner; K L Lam; M A Helvie
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer.

Authors:  J N Wolfe
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Cancer Statistics, 2017.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  A F Saftlas; R N Hoover; L A Brinton; M Szklo; D R Olson; M Salane; J N Wolfe
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Breast composition measurements using retrospective standard mammogram form (SMF).

Authors:  R Highnam; X Pan; R Warren; M Jeffreys; G Davey Smith; M Brady
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Population-Attributable Risk Proportion of Clinical Risk Factors for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Natalie J Engmann; Marzieh K Golmakani; Diana L Miglioretti; Brian L Sprague; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  CAD and AI for breast cancer-recent development and challenges.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan; Ravi K Samala; Lubomir M Hadjiiski
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Area-based breast percentage density estimation in mammograms using weight-adaptive multitask learning.

Authors:  Veli-Matti Kosma; Arto Mannermaa; Naga Raju Gudhe; Hamid Behravan; Mazen Sudah; Hidemi Okuma; Ritva Vanninen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  Clinical Artificial Intelligence Applications: Breast Imaging.

Authors:  Qiyuan Hu; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.947

Review 4.  Artificial Intelligence for Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Krzysztof J Geras; Ritse M Mann; Linda Moy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Detection and classification the breast tumors using mask R-CNN on sonograms.

Authors:  Jui-Ying Chiao; Kuan-Yung Chen; Ken Ying-Kai Liao; Po-Hsin Hsieh; Geoffrey Zhang; Tzung-Chi Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 6.  Artificial intelligence in mammographic phenotyping of breast cancer risk: a narrative review.

Authors:  Aimilia Gastounioti; Shyam Desai; Vinayak S Ahluwalia; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 8.408

7.  Spatial Distribution Analysis of Novel Texture Feature Descriptors for Accurate Breast Density Classification.

Authors:  Haipeng Li; Ramakrishnan Mukundan; Shelley Boyd
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Fully automatic classification of breast MRI background parenchymal enhancement using a transfer learning approach.

Authors:  Karol Borkowski; Cristina Rossi; Alexander Ciritsis; Magda Marcon; Patryk Hejduk; Sonja Stieb; Andreas Boss; Nicole Berger
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.