Literature DB >> 16251232

Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention.

P Pibarot1, J G Dumesnil.   

Abstract

Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) is present when the effective orifice area of the inserted prosthetic valve is too small in relation to body size. Its main haemodynamic consequence is to generate higher than expected gradients through normally functioning prosthetic valves. This review updates the present knowledge about the impact of PPM on clinical outcomes. PPM is common (20-70% of aortic valve replacements) and has been shown to be associated with worse haemodynamic function, less regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, more cardiac events, and lower survival. Moreover, as opposed to most other risk factors, PPM can largely be prevented by using a prospective strategy at the time of operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16251232      PMCID: PMC1861088          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2005.067363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  44 in total

Review 1.  The concept of patient-prosthesis mismatch.

Authors:  Claudio Muneretto; Gianluigi Bisleri; Alberto Negri; Jacopo Manfredi
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2004-05

2.  Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival in patients with small St Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in the aortic position.

Authors:  Dania Mohty; Dania Mohty-Echahidi; Joseph F Malouf; Steve E Girard; Hartzell V Schaff; Diane E Grill; Maurice E Enriquez-Sarano; Fletcher A Miller
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-01-16       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Impact of prosthesis-patient size on functional recovery after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Colleen Gorman Koch; Farah Khandwala; Fawzy G Estafanous; Floyd D Loop; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Valve prosthesis--patient mismatch. A long-term sequela.

Authors:  S H Rahimtoola; E Murphy
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1981-03

5.  Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Claudia Blais; Jean G Dumesnil; Richard Baillot; Serge Simard; Daniel Doyle; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-08-11       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch.

Authors:  S H Rahimtoola
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Eugene H Blackstone; Delos M Cosgrove; W R Eric Jamieson; Nancy J Birkmeyer; John H Lemmer; D Craig Miller; Eric G Butchart; Giulio Rizzoli; Magdi Yacoub; Akiko Chai
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with aortic prosthetic valves.

Authors:  Marc Ruel; Fraser D Rubens; Roy G Masters; Andrew L Pipe; Pierre Bédard; Paul J Hendry; B Khanh Lam; Ian G Burwash; William G Goldstein; Maurice P Brais; Wilbert J Keon; Thierry G Mesana
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Late results after mitral valve replacement with bileaflet mechanical prosthesis in children: evaluation of prosthesis-patient mismatch.

Authors:  Munetaka Masuda; Hideaki Kado; Hideki Tatewaki; Yuichiro Shiokawa; Hisataka Yasui
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Mass regression in aortic stenosis after valve replacement with small size pericardial bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Giordano Tasca; Federico Brunelli; Marco Cirillo; Andrea Amaducci; Zen Mhagna; Giovanni Troise; Eugenio Quaini
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  74 in total

1.  Prevention of valve prosthesis--patient mismatch before aortic valve replacement: does it matter and is it feasible?

Authors:  Philippe Pibarot; Jean G Dumesnil
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Assessment of aortic stenosis severity: check the valve but don't forget the arteries!

Authors:  Philippe Pibarot; Jean G Dumesnil
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  A modification to the Manouguian aortoplasty for biological valve implantation in patients with small (< or =19 mm) aortic anuli--rationale and benefit.

Authors:  Andreas Borowski; Muhammed Kurt
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2008

4.  Transcatheter resection of the native aortic valve prior to endovalve implantation - A rational approach to reduce TAVI-induced complications.

Authors:  Parla Astarci; Pierre-Yves Etienne; Benoit Raucent; Xavier Bollen; Kahn Tranduy; David Glineur; Laurent Dekerchove; Philippe Noirhomme; Gébrine Elkhoury
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

5.  Patient-prosthesis mismatch after transapical aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Marian Kukucka; Miralem Pasic; Stephan Dreysse; Semih Buz; Thorsten Drews; Alexander Mladenow; Helmut Habazettl; Hermann Kuppe; Axel Unbehaun; Roland Hetzer
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

6.  Aortic valve annular dimension in Indian population.

Authors:  Hannah Sugirthabai Rajila Rajendran; Sudha Seshayyan; Ashok Victor; Gangadevi Rajapandian
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-09-10

7.  Primary echocardiographic results of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna.

Authors:  Hiroki Mizoguchi; Masayuki Sakaki; Kazushige Inoue; Yasuhiko Kobayashi; Takashi Iwata; Yasuo Suehiro; Takuya Miura
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 8.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch: an update.

Authors:  Jean G Dumesnil; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Incidence and impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Hatim Seoudy; Nathalie Güßefeld; Johanne Frank; Sandra Freitag-Wolf; Georg Lutter; Matthias Eden; Ashraf Yusuf Rangrez; Christian Kuhn; Norbert Frey; Derk Frank
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 5.460

10.  Aortic valve bypass: experience from Denmark.

Authors:  Jens T Lund; Maiken B Jensen; Henrik Arendrup; Nikolaj Ihlemann
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.